

Why it is easy to root against LCC!!
#61
Posted 08 November 2007 - 09:19 PM

Bandido- November 24, 1957- August 12th, 2011.....RIP, my good friend... things will never be the same here without you. :(
Gonemad -June 26th, 1962-May 13th, 2008
sliceslicebaby@facebook.com
sliceslicebaby@twitter.com
#62 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 08 November 2007 - 09:23 PM
Or you could spend valuable paranoia on a Grove conspiracy to slay the Thunderbird Dragon!

P.S Will Play....I also enjoy poking my friends from Grove as I am sure they enjoy what they do. I do ask you though if you had a magic wand what would you have LCC do? Tell a kid he can't come here because he or she is good at something and turn away students and tuition money which ultimately is what the school runs on? Okay mom and dad, your kid is sound academically, he or she is a good kid, you are willing to pay tuition but I'm sorry your kid is too good and we don't want anyone to think poorly of us. You better send them to Grove. While you are calling LCC a sports factory remember we are also a citizen factory that turns out a vast majority of well rounded, intelligent citizens who maybe even got a little religion why they were here. Now that can't be that bad can it?
#63
Posted 08 November 2007 - 10:19 PM
Your arrogance lies in the fact that you think everyone on the planet shares your opinion. For those who agree with you, I suggest that they join you in supplying evidence of wrong-doing before you throw the cheating label around. In other words, (for the uneducated), put up or shut up.
By the way, the girls volleyball team will be playing for a state championship on Saturday. Congratulations!!
Edited by dawgbone, 08 November 2007 - 10:20 PM.
#64 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 08 November 2007 - 10:54 PM
#65
Posted 08 November 2007 - 11:21 PM
Another point..... I think other sports programs at LCC are taking an unfair hit for this. To my knowledge, I may be wrong, but I dont think any other program has the number of "transfer's" or new players whatever you want to call them, coming in every year. I think the football program, IMO, is making all the other programs look like they get new players too.
Also I would like to say congrats to the Birds on the big volleyball win.
----Just think when Laughing Eyes gets on here and see's this thread. Put on your helmets, it could get ugly!!

Edited by OhioDog5, 08 November 2007 - 11:34 PM.
#66 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 08 November 2007 - 11:29 PM
#67
Posted 08 November 2007 - 11:38 PM

#68 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 08 November 2007 - 11:40 PM

sure why not, you've earned it.

#69
Posted 08 November 2007 - 11:48 PM
By the way- when does the LCC volleyball team play for the title?
#70
Posted 09 November 2007 - 12:39 AM
Please note that I'm aware that as part of LCC-fan's defense coping mechanism they have convinced themselves (or pretend to have convinced themselves) that it is only a small minority of sport fan who looks down upon their program. While I might opine that such denial is as silly as trying to convince us that your volleyball coach and fans don't really care about their reputations at all...I'll grant a little friendship twig.
The typical LCC-fan simply may not know the extent of their reputation as most people tend to practice "if you don't have something nice to say"... Therefore the typical T-bird may not know the extent of their stench...as it relates to accepting other school's athletes (troubled or academically inclined). I myself would never cause conflict in a personal conversation with anybody from LCC unless and until irrationally provoked...and I'm as harsh a critic of athletic transfer abuse that I know. There are times and places for such debate...and we are there. However, confusing this manners-related nicety as evidence for maintaining clear-conscience for no wrongdoing is simply not a thought or action based in reality. Your closeness to the Thunderbird's disqualifies your ability to accurately judge the level of disdain for which your actions inflict. Safe to say that out-of-ear-shot, a typical conversation about LCC among NWC competitors is not a complimentary chit chat. Transfer abuse and the C-word (cheating) are the norm.
Now I'm not pompous enough to extrapolate my numerous experiences with sport's discussions and declare my experiences to represent the majority viewpoint (though I freely admit I've hunch that many agree with my general sentiment)...but will indeed chuckle at the counter-argument which paints the opposition as merely a few uneducated Grove fans. While we've certainly no way to scientifically poll the prevailing attitude concerning LCC's loose athletic acceptance policies, common sense dictates my attitude is certainly not unique. Of course common sense would dictate that your volleyball coach actually cares about his reputation...and we know how LCC-fan is spinning that one!

#71
Posted 09 November 2007 - 01:07 AM
Good posts and thanks for the support in the tournament.
However, there is one thing that I'd like to point out. While I'll be the first to admit that LCC has benefitted from the help of a couple transfers the last couple of seasons in Good, Bowers (who initially transferred TO Grove), and Ruggley. But the thing that goes unnoticed is that LCC has also lost it's only DI prospects during that time as well in Jamhiir Williams and Ryan Nathan. Both of them transferred to public schools, and when you transfer from private to public you don't have to sit out a year AND don't have to get clearance from the superintendant. You get a free pass to leave. On the other hand, when transferring from public to private, a student must get clearance from the previous school's superintendant to play the next season. So in actuality, the people who have the authority to decide whether these transfers can play at their new school have nothing to do with LCC. From LCC's standpoint, they see a student who's going to pay tuition and bring in more money. They could care less if the student is an athlete, can play right away, or whatever the case may be. That's why they take in students each year who don't even play athletics.
I know we're never going to see eye to eye on this, and that's fine. That's a part of sports. I just wanted to point out that while LCC has gotten some help from some transfers lately, they also lose as much they gain because of the same reason. In fact, it's only been recently that LCC has even come close to gaining from transfers athletically what they lose.
#72
Posted 09 November 2007 - 06:53 AM
#73
Posted 09 November 2007 - 09:59 AM
Will Play...so, as LCC was getting transfers for many years and losing, why was that not a problem? Why is it only a problem when they win? When Jerry Cooper came to LCC, he in essence inherited the exact same team as the previous coach left. He took that team to the Regional Finals in the amazement of the entire Lima community. The difference? Perhaps a coach who got them to buy into excellence and hard work? If boys then decide they want to play in a successful program for a proven coach (I know you hate him now, but you sure loved him when he was on your sidelines), they're released by their superintendent, they're willing to abide by the standards that LCC proposes, and nothing was done to break any rules, where is the cheating that you have verbally accused?
My suggestion to all those who are in dismay of athletes leaving their school is to build a program and a school that no one wants to leave. As Clarett fan points out, LCC lost plenty of student athletes over many years. Did they get on forums and cry foul? No, instead they tried to better their situation with the hiring of a coach who has instilled an attitude of winning in the boys. Have there been transfers since he came? Yes. Were there transfers before? Yes. In both directions; leaving and coming in. The problem? LCC is winning now. I was taught to congratulate people on their accomplishments; not tear them down to make myself feel better. I was taught to step up my game if I wanted things to be better; not throw mud at people who beat me.
#74
Posted 09 November 2007 - 11:01 AM
My participation in this thread was to take a new approach. For arguments sake I was willing to play along and pretend that LCC has absolutely no fault whatsoever...and that their sullied reputation was a big misunderstanding. This indeed is the point of view of the most extreme of LCC-supporters...which far as I can tell makes up the preponderance of those participating these days. I figured a thread about the unfair treatment of an LCC volleyball coach, complete with said coach's participation and parental/fanatic support...and with a supposedly "home-grown" volleyball team making a tourney run...was a decent opportunity to point out how LCC's sullied reputation affects their own innocents...who really benefit not-at-all from the shenanigans associated with your football program. So given a free pass for debate purposes to posses that moral high ground of deniability for all wrongdoing...what are you left with?
LCC still has a sullied reputation!
Even as you've convinced yourselves that it is undeserved and unfair...it is what it is! Even should you be granted complete intellectual immunity for your transgressions...your stuck with your reputation.
I merely opine that the very tactics I predicted, and are on full display here...will do nothing to change your reputation. You simply do not change sullied reputations by blaming everybody else and attempting to bring others down to your level. You don't change reputations by arguing legal loopholes. It is simply not a redeeming quality to deflect criticism of your own shortcomings by belittling others. If I grant you that Grove should have never played Bowers (they probably should not have by the way)...what does this do to change LCC's own actions? The fact is (whether fair or not), Grove is not the program with the reputation problem. Nor is any of the other NWC school. This is simply LCC's burden to bear alone...for the Lima-land area. If your best hope for maintaining whatever fragile reputation you believe you posses...involves implementing a "misery loves company" strategy...safe to say there is good chance you may not know how this public relations thing works.
You change reputations and public perception by being contrite...sometimes you simply have to bite your tongue. It is a tough and humbling lesson the likes of which Pete Rose and Barry Bonds have still yet to learn. Stubbornness and pride can often blind those who are too close to the situation to take corrective action that might actually work, rather than continue the same path of deniability, deflection, and acting obstinate. I'm not really asking for LCC-fan/coach/etc to actually eat humble pie to correct their reputation as I'm aware that such humbling experience is difficult. I just illustrate that there is an alternative approach available to constantly belittling other programs, feigning stone hearts, calling detractors uneducated, hiding behind rules while ignoring rule intentions, etc. Repentance is available as the public indeed is a forgiving bunch for those willing to take a few humbling steps.
Knowing that stubbornness, deniability , and deflection are the tools of choice in dealing with the reputation problem...I've demonstrated how strict adherence to these coping mechanisms actually end up hurting your own. Like it or not...fair or unfair...reputations have ways of dragging down innocents. As an outsider, I cannot fathom that LCC's own have not stepped up to question the events/policies/actions that have lead to the continuance of the sullied reputation. I would think that somebody would have demonstrated the strength and courage to challenge the group think mentality and possibly point out some of the stuff I've discussed on this thread. But I'm guessing my outsider status makes me incapable of understanding the intrinsic reflex action to deny and deflect. In this sense, I'm as incapable of understanding Thunderbird reaction as the LCC-faithful are of understanding the depth of their reputation problem. You have to be there to understand...they always say!
#75 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 09 November 2007 - 12:55 PM
OhioDog your last post was the most quality post a non LCC person has ever put forth in all of these many debates and for that I thank you. WillPlay I wish someone aside from you would post such well thought out and long winded disertations on our cheating ways but in reality it is just you. Sure we have the usual back and forth with Grove as Dog points out rather clearly, I can respect his reasons. You claim somewhat that you speak for many and I simply don't see that. I think the general population of the NWC, save for a handful of radicals at each location, respect and admire our programs. And again we simply aren't concerned whether you or any of these so called radicals perceive that we have a bad rep. I just say these issues are "you problems". We don't care, we only respond when people post BS and we try to educate people on reality of the world today. You problem. Your perception. Your words. thats all nothing more. Even with that though I find myself sitting patiently, excitedly waiting for your next thesis when I see your name logged in.
So why do we continue in this debate when it will not change anyone's opinions? Because as humans we enjoy poking at each other and their perceived shortcomings and trying to impress others with our long winded soliliqueys, (I know will play not spelled right), and usage of big words. You do a very nice job of that I might add. So in keeping with my reputation of picking with my Columbus Grove friends I ask this question......how many of you clowns on here were one of the 9 write in votes for Bogart for mayor?
#76
Posted 09 November 2007 - 01:08 PM
As an outsider, I cannot fathom that LCC's own have not stepped up to question the events/policies/actions that have lead to the continuance of the sullied reputation. I would think that somebody would have demonstrated the strength and courage to challenge the group think mentality and possibly point out some of the stuff I've discussed on this thread.
I can't really see anybody doing that when your winning. It would be hard to do so if you experience success in a sport where you were normally not that strong. Who would want to ruin that. I also think its interesting that the only time we played a transfer was when Jerry Cooper was coach. And the only time we had a transfer come in to simply play football for Grove when Jerry Cooper was coach. Is that just coincidence, hmmm

#77
Posted 09 November 2007 - 01:25 PM
.gif)
Bandido- November 24, 1957- August 12th, 2011.....RIP, my good friend... things will never be the same here without you. :(
Gonemad -June 26th, 1962-May 13th, 2008
sliceslicebaby@facebook.com
sliceslicebaby@twitter.com
#78 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 09 November 2007 - 01:48 PM

not a coincedence I am sure and I am glad to finally hear someone from Grove admit their school has also participated in such shenanigans as Will Play calls it. not a coincedence and fortunatly or unfortunatly not against the rules in either case.
#79
Posted 09 November 2007 - 06:11 PM
Who is this Bosco character.......does he live in the area!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#80 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 09 November 2007 - 06:48 PM
Who is this Bosco character.......does he live in the area!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He has been held down by THE MAN since just after I joined the corner. I heckled him to the point he snapped and THE MAN put him in check. As the person responsible for his rocketcorner jailing I went on a one man crusade to get him freed from his bondage by the big government man! As this goes to press however it appears that THE MAN is considering an early furlough for BOSCO most likely due to the constant pressure put on by the shoe!!!!
I think Bosco is from Grove too and I missed making fun of him all the time.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users