Posted 08 September 2007 - 05:50 PM
Posted 09 September 2007 - 12:51 PM
Posted 09 September 2007 - 03:01 PM
Posted 09 September 2007 - 07:13 PM
I still say Michigan will be fine. So long as they don't face anyone with a mobile QB who can throw again.
Posted 09 September 2007 - 07:37 PM
Posted 09 September 2007 - 11:21 PM
Posted 10 September 2007 - 02:53 PM
Posted 10 September 2007 - 05:46 PM
Posted 10 September 2007 - 08:19 PM
Posted 10 September 2007 - 08:52 PM
Posted 10 September 2007 - 11:12 PM
I don't get the BCS, some teams can play a whole bunch of Div 1-AA teams for their non conference and move up, a team like USC can get away with not playing for a week or two and they gain first place votes! Then you get a team like Rutgers who for nine weeks last year was undefeated and move down after a big conference win... to me the BCS is just down right stupid.
Posted 22 September 2012 - 06:22 AM
Posted 02 January 2013 - 04:32 PM
Posted 02 January 2013 - 05:00 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 11:01 PM
The conference needs the middle tier to step up, plain and simple. OSU and Michigan will end up being fine with Meyer and Hoke, both just need a couple of years. Nebraska, Wisconsin, Michigan State, and Iowa HAVE to be better. Northwestern should be REALLY good next year, but that will just hurt the national opinion(when Northwestern is a top 3-4 team, the league can't be good, whatever).
The next round of expansion and what they do will be interesting. If they settle for Virginia and North Carolina, then they'll remain behind. If they go big and grab Florida State who obviously wants out of the ACC, then the league can get REALLY good again. I don't like the whole idea of superconferences myself, and the idea of Georgia Tech and/or Florida State in the Big Ten is laughable to me. But they're coming, and as one of the 2 big money leagues they may as well be proactive and grab the big dogs.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users