
College Football Top 25 Preseason Coaches Poll
#21
Posted 05 September 2007 - 10:20 AM
#22
Posted 05 September 2007 - 02:29 PM
How so? Like others said. Go easy on the powerhouses in Duke and Navy.
This year, OSU does have a weak schedule. Look at the schedule in a few years. I know it gets a bit tougher but I'm too lazy to look it up. The only team I can remember is USC though.
#23
Posted 05 September 2007 - 02:50 PM
Also, yes we do have a young team and by the end of the year they should be good, but we need them to be good NOW! After the preformance against GT, we are going to get stomped by PSU, we might be able to sneek by UM, depending if they are still down from their loss or we will get the blunt of their frustration and lose, MSU I'll say we can win along with Purdue, UCLA no chance, BC we'll win, USC we just won't go there, so a 7-5 or 8-4 will be extremely good for the team this year.
And I'll close with this to the OSU fans, this is not meant to downplay you guys, but seriously the whole 34-20 scoreline is really getting old. It happened 2 years ago. You had the better team and you outplayed us so congrats, and LET IT GO ALREADY!
#24
Posted 05 September 2007 - 03:33 PM
#25
Posted 05 September 2007 - 05:03 PM
"Well, I may be a scholar, but I most certainly am not a gentleman."
#26
Posted 05 September 2007 - 06:39 PM
#27
Posted 05 September 2007 - 06:41 PM

#28
Posted 05 September 2007 - 06:50 PM
#29
Posted 05 September 2007 - 06:50 PM
read this article this is the one i was talking about
http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?p=1391835
Edited by bigNDfan#85, 05 September 2007 - 06:53 PM.
#30
Posted 05 September 2007 - 07:03 PM
Remember Chris Weinke?
Edited by tigerball13, 05 September 2007 - 07:04 PM.
#31
Posted 05 September 2007 - 07:06 PM
#32
Posted 05 September 2007 - 07:08 PM
"Well, I may be a scholar, but I most certainly am not a gentleman."
#33
Posted 05 September 2007 - 07:12 PM
So are phamacists all losers? They have to go to school for 7 years if I'm not mistaken.
#34
Posted 05 September 2007 - 07:13 PM
Yes, quite the loser, obviously, because he accepts a free education for 6 years in pretty much anything he wants. Hell, he could be outta law school by the time he finishes his senior season if he played the free academic opportunities at Ohio State enough!
"Well, I may be a scholar, but I most certainly am not a gentleman."
#35
Posted 05 September 2007 - 07:14 PM
Ha...yeah...his thought process obviously doesn't get too deep when it comes to climbing into bed with his favorite team.
"Well, I may be a scholar, but I most certainly am not a gentleman."
#36
Posted 05 September 2007 - 07:17 PM
#37
Posted 05 September 2007 - 07:19 PM
Redshirt= staying on scholarship but no playing.
There you go.
#38
Posted 05 September 2007 - 07:25 PM
http://und.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/052506aaa.html
OSU graduation rate 55% (not to bad)
http://stanford.scout.com/2/618619.html (just scroll down and you can see alot of schools even ND's)
Edited by bigNDfan#85, 05 September 2007 - 07:36 PM.
#39
Posted 05 September 2007 - 08:21 PM
Notre Dame: Charlie Cheeseburger - arrogant and over-rated
OSU: Jim Tressel - class in every sense
I'll take the guy that wears the sweater vest versus the guy who wears his belt under his boobs.
Edited by Tim Dweeb, 05 September 2007 - 08:22 PM.
#40
Posted 06 September 2007 - 11:03 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users