267 replies to this topic

[clutch]

Rocketman, on 10 February 2014 - 07:43 AM, said:

John Q,
What with this story and all the previous ones, what would be their defense if something did happen?......they certainly couldn't claim they didn"t know, that's for sure....Cooper left a few weeks ago to avert any OHSAA sanctions....in the NCAA they call this "lack of institutional contol"

This is factual?

[JohnMcClane]

clutch, on 10 February 2014 - 10:48 AM, said:

You can read, correct? I literally asked if it happened because I didnt know (neither do you). Todd walker reported that frank was outside of the refs lockeroom with a cell phone to possibly try and show them a video, correct? Everyone hears that on here and explodes so I simply asked if he even actually made contact with the officials? No one seems to know for sure...

Yes, I can read. But I don't have the same kind of glasses that you see through. Does it matter if he talked to the officials or not. The intent was the same. To show up an official. What do you think Kill's intention was? I don't think he wanted to show him pictures of his family vacation?

[Rocketman]

JohnMcClane, on 10 February 2014 - 11:13 AM, said:

Yes, I can read. But I don't have the same kind of glasses that you see through. Does it matter if he talked to the officials or not. The intent was the same. To show up an official. What do you think Kill's intention was? I don't think he wanted to show him pictures of his family vacation?

Can I get an AMEN?

[Bluetiger76]

Amen brother!

[Irish Viking 87]

clutch, on 09 February 2014 - 10:05 PM, said:

Oh please. You know exactly what hes talking about when he says "get better". Hes saying that about all the people (including you) who throw out empty accusations and excuses as reasons for lcc success and or victories over the school they support.

Clutch,

First of all, I didn't know that schrades needed a mouthpiece to talk for him. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out what "get better and beat us means" Elida did that and all we hear is accusations and excuses on why it happened.

Secondly, the school I support doesn't play LCC. So that thought holds no merit.

Thirdly, I will admit that it was a blown call out of bounds at the end. The foul, I thought was legitimate. The LCC player's left arm was on Dakota's hip and knocked him off balance, therefore creating an advantage. That being said, refer to my earlier post, if LCC doesn't fall behind 17-6, if they don't let Mathias go off for 42,and if they don't get a technical for taunting then the two calls at the end don't matter and Frankie isn't camped outside the ref's lockerroom and we are not talking about this.

It's posters like you and schrades that fuel the LCC fire. You both see everything LCC does through rose colored glasses and refuse to admit anything anyone at LCC ever does is wrong.

[schrades]

Irish Viking 87, on 10 February 2014 - 01:16 PM, said:

Clutch,

First of all, I didn't know that schrades needed a mouthpiece to talk for him. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out what "get better and beat us means" Elida did that and all we hear is accusations and excuses on why it happened.

Secondly, the school I support doesn't play LCC. So that thought holds no merit.

Thirdly, I will admit that it was a blown call out of bounds at the end. The foul, I thought was legitimate. The LCC player's left arm was on Dakota's hip and knocked him off balance, therefore creating an advantage. That being said, refer to my earlier post, if LCC doesn't fall behind 17-6, if they don't let Mathias go off for 42,and if they don't get a technical for taunting then the two calls at the end don't matter and Frankie isn't camped outside the ref's lockerroom and we are not talking about this.

It's posters like you and schrades that fuel the LCC fire. You both see everything LCC does through rose colored glasses and refuse to admit anything anyone at LCC ever does is wrong.

bah..... It's like I always said, no matter what - win or lose - LCC can do no right in the eyes of the RM community. If it wasnt this it would be something else that someone is trying to dramatize. Kinf of like TMZ or the National Enquirer....hmmm, where have I heard that before??

[JohnMcClane]

Irish Viking 87, on 10 February 2014 - 01:16 PM, said:

First of all, I didn't know that schrades needed a mouthpiece to talk for him. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out what "get better and beat us means" Elida did that and all we hear is accusations and excuses on why it happened.

schrades, on 10 February 2014 - 01:25 PM, said:

bah..... It's like I always said, no matter what - win or lose - LCC can do no right in the eyes of the RM community. If it wasnt this it would be something else that someone is trying to dramatize. Kinf of like TMZ or the National Enquirer....hmmm, where have I heard that before??

I see why schrades needs a mouthpiece to speak for him. TMZ and National Enquirer is the only thing you can come up with to defend the actions of LSCC finest.

[clutch]

JohnMcClane, on 10 February 2014 - 11:13 AM, said:

Yes, I can read. But I don't have the same kind of glasses that you see through. Does it matter if he talked to the officials or not. The intent was the same. To show up an official. What do you think Kill's intention was? I don't think he wanted to show him pictures of his family vacation?

Lol omg did he show up the official? So he might have intended to show up the official? Lets stone him.

[JohnMcClane]

clutch, on 10 February 2014 - 01:52 PM, said:

Lol omg did he show up the official? So he might have intended to show up the official? Lets stone him.

Stone him??? No way. Pointing out his flaws and watching the congregation blindly defend him is way more entertaining. If you ask me it's even better than TMZ.

[Mr Bearcat]

I just love how defensive LCC people get!

[clutch]

Irish Viking 87, on 10 February 2014 - 01:16 PM, said:

Clutch,

First of all, I didn't know that schrades needed a mouthpiece to talk for him. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out what "get better and beat us means" Elida did that and all we hear is accusations and excuses on why it happened.

Secondly, the school I support doesn't play LCC. So that thought holds no merit.

Thirdly, I will admit that it was a blown call out of bounds at the end. The foul, I thought was legitimate. The LCC player's left arm was on Dakota's hip and knocked him off balance, therefore creating an advantage. That being said, refer to my earlier post, if LCC doesn't fall behind 17-6, if they don't let Mathias go off for 42,and if they don't get a technical for taunting then the two calls at the end don't matter and Frankie isn't camped outside the ref's lockerroom and we are not talking about this.

It's posters like you and schrades that fuel the LCC fire. You both see everything LCC does through rose colored glasses and refuse to admit anything anyone at LCC ever does is wrong.

You couldnt be more wrong. I dont blame losses on referees unless its the nfl and I know more then any of you the good and the bad of lcc. I've never claimed lcc is perfect because that would obviously be a lie. That said, im not going to let people like rocketman tell his "conspiracy theories" and lies not only about how lcc does business but also the employment of its teachers and coaches.
As for frank kill, he will be coach at lcc for as long as he wants, period. His body language on the sidelines can be irritating to watch but there isn't another person I would rather represent lcc.

[clutch]

JohnMcClane, on 10 February 2014 - 02:00 PM, said:

Stone him??? No way. Pointing out his flaws and watching the congregation blindly defend him is way more entertaining. If you ask me it's even better than TMZ.

Blindly defend him from what? Blind accusations? All im saying is NO ONE KNOWS what happened. Maybe cooler heads prevailed and he walked away? Maybe he did try and show the ref and made a fool of himself which would have been wrong....we dont know.

[Irish Viking 87]

clutch, on 10 February 2014 - 02:03 PM, said:

You couldnt be more wrong. I dont blame losses on referees unless its the nfl and I know more then any of you the good and the bad of lcc. I've never claimed lcc is perfect because that would obviously be a lie. That said, im not going to let people like rocketman tell his "conspiracy theories" and lies not only about how lcc does business but also the employment of its teachers and coaches.
As for frank kill, he will be coach at lcc for as long as he wants, period. His body language on the sidelines can be irritating to watch but there isn't another person I would rather represent lcc.

His body language on the sidelines won't be his downfall. Continued trips to the ref's lockerroom after games will be.

As for conspiracy theories, the easiest way to shut them down is discredit them. I have yet to see that from you. If you are on the "inside" at LCC(know more then any of you about the good and bad of LCC) that should be easy to do.

[clutch]

Bobby, on 09 February 2014 - 09:24 PM, said:

Maybe a bunch of you can get a group rate on counseling for your disturbing obsession with LCC. It's starting to get really, really creepy.

Yep

[schrades]

JohnMcClane, on 10 February 2014 - 01:42 PM, said:

I see why schrades needs a mouthpiece to speak for him. TMZ and National Enquirer is the only thing you can come up with to defend the actions of LSCC finest.

Hey if it walks like a duck and sound like a duck, then it must be a duck.

[clutch]

Irish Viking 87, on 10 February 2014 - 02:19 PM, said:

His body language on the sidelines won't be his downfall. Continued trips to the ref's lockerroom after games will be.

As for conspiracy theories, the easiest way to shut them down is discredit them. I have yet to see that from you. If you are on the "inside" at LCC(know more then any of you about the good and bad of LCC) that should be easy to do.

Lol really? Why dont you prove what you are claiming is true?

[Irish Viking 87]

clutch, on 10 February 2014 - 02:11 PM, said:

Blindly defend him from what? Blind accusations? All im saying is NO ONE KNOWS what happened. Maybe cooler heads prevailed and he walked away? Maybe he did try and show the ref and made a fool of himself which would have been wrong....we dont know.

You call it blind accusations, yet Colt45 says he saw him outside the door for a couple of minutes. Undoubtably left when they wouldn't open the door.If they would have opened the door, what good for anyone could of possibly come from it.

[Irish Viking 87]

clutch, on 10 February 2014 - 02:27 PM, said:

Lol really? Why dont you prove what you are claiming is true?

I think I did. AGAIN, If LCC does't get down 17-6, if they don't let Mathias go off for 42, and if they don't get a technical for taunting, the last two calls don't matter.

Your turn.

[clutch]

Irish Viking 87, on 10 February 2014 - 02:28 PM, said:

You call it blind accusations, yet Colt45 says he saw him outside the door for a couple of minutes. Undoubtably left when they wouldn't open the door.If they would have opened the door, what good for anyone could of possibly come from it.

So he never made contact with the officials? Great. Should he have been outside their door? No. He probably realized that and walked away. What he did was wrong but it doesnt warrant this amount of scrutiny.

[clutch]

Irish Viking 87, on 10 February 2014 - 02:31 PM, said:

I think I did. AGAIN, If LCC does't get down 17-6, if they don't let Mathias go off for 42, and if they don't get a technical for taunting, the last two calls don't matter.

Your turn.

Lol I wasn't talking about the "theories" of why they lost the game. They lost....and I never blamed the officials for the loss. My first post after the game I mentioned that missed calls are part of the game.

Edited by clutch, 10 February 2014 - 02:38 PM.