
Cory-Rawson
#41
Posted 18 October 2013 - 11:36 AM
#42
Posted 18 October 2013 - 11:45 AM
foamcity, on 18 October 2013 - 11:36 AM, said:
Then learn to use your big boy ways of communicating and all will be well

Unfortunately I'm one of those people who's not too big to walk away from insults lol.
#43
Posted 18 October 2013 - 11:50 AM
Hagen, on 17 October 2013 - 10:17 AM, said:
1. The hard-to-accept fact is that class sizes are dwindling, for the most part, in rural schools & also that kids, as a whole, are less physically active today due to having other options for entertainment with television, internet and game consoles, as opposed to going outside and actually doing something physically with friends. Participation in extra-curriculars are down across the board. Also, concept of "team" is down across society as "individuality" is being encouraged from younger ages.
2. If smaller schools wish to excel in fall sports, they will need to choose between soccer and football. It's extremely rare for small rural public schools to be good at both without an outstanding culture/long-tenured coaches.
"The times, they are a changin'...
You have to get a vision from your board, superintendent and the powers that be of what success looks like. For some, having 45 kids in a class of 65 in football, soccer, volleyball or band and choir IS success. But for others, success is fielding the BEST teams that you can. The community IS NOT going to support losing programs. May not be right, but it's reality. Look at the local teams who are good at football, McComb, Arlington, Leipsic...no soccer. LB has more kids and is actually a unique situation, they somehow are able to have good athletic teams across the board. But look at Van Buren, and some of the NWC schools.
As for the first point, we're in week 7, there may be days when you can't practice for 2+ hours, especially when you have such low numbers. Maybe they are watching films? Who knows.
#44
Posted 18 October 2013 - 12:11 PM
#45
Posted 18 October 2013 - 12:13 PM
JAPES, on 17 October 2013 - 09:58 PM, said:
Edited by WimbledonChamp, 18 October 2013 - 12:20 PM.
#46
Posted 18 October 2013 - 12:27 PM
foamcity, on 17 October 2013 - 07:13 PM, said:
JAPES, on 17 October 2013 - 09:58 PM, said:

HH75, on 18 October 2013 - 10:31 AM, said:
And if your offend by that I frankly don't care!
Also, I have yet to disagree that CR has a problem. What I'm saying is that how a select group of individuals on here have gone about it is inane. Until adults act like adults and handle this in the appropriate manner, nothing
Edited by Hagen, 18 October 2013 - 12:28 PM.
#47
Posted 18 October 2013 - 12:34 PM
#48
Posted 18 October 2013 - 12:36 PM
cmyk, on 17 October 2013 - 07:29 PM, said:
Common Sense, on 18 October 2013 - 11:50 AM, said:
#49
Posted 18 October 2013 - 12:43 PM
– The manager is a copy; the leader is an original.
– The manager maintains; the leader develops.
– The manager focuses on systems and structure; the leader focuses on people.
– The manager relies on control; the leader inspires trust.
– The manager has a short-range view; the leader has a long-range perspective.
– The manager asks how and when; the leader asks what and why.
– The manager has his or her eye always on the bottom line; the leader’s eye is on the horizon.
– The manager imitates; the leader originates.
– The manager accepts the status quo; the leader challenges it.
– The manager is the classic good soldier; the leader is his or her own person.
– The manager does things right; the leader does the right thing.
#50
Posted 18 October 2013 - 12:46 PM
foamcity, on 18 October 2013 - 10:50 AM, said:
foamcity, on 18 October 2013 - 12:11 PM, said:
I'll go ahead and refresh your memory anytime you ask buddy

#51
Posted 18 October 2013 - 12:47 PM
foamcity, on 18 October 2013 - 12:43 PM, said:
– The manager is a copy; the leader is an original.
– The manager maintains; the leader develops.
– The manager focuses on systems and structure; the leader focuses on people.
– The manager relies on control; the leader inspires trust.
– The manager has a short-range view; the leader has a long-range perspective.
– The manager asks how and when; the leader asks what and why.
– The manager has his or her eye always on the bottom line; the leader’s eye is on the horizon.
– The manager imitates; the leader originates.
– The manager accepts the status quo; the leader challenges it.
– The manager is the classic good soldier; the leader is his or her own person.
– The manager does things right; the leader does the right thing.
Where did you get this bag of garbage from?
You've been reading WAY too many motivational posters.
#52
Posted 18 October 2013 - 12:50 PM
#55
Posted 18 October 2013 - 01:02 PM
#56
Posted 18 October 2013 - 01:09 PM
foamcity, on 18 October 2013 - 01:02 PM, said:
#57
Posted 18 October 2013 - 01:12 PM
As for the name calling, you are CLEARLY a young individual, or at least I hope so, because that kind of immaturity from someone who isn't young is just sad.
I never asked for clarification of anything from you, I follow what you were trying to do, you just failed miserably at it.
There are some valid points that could probably be made to back up your argument about leadership vs. management, but that would require critical thinking, not a google search.
It's ok, keep swinging buddy, eventually you HAVE to blurt something out that is decent.... right?
In the meantime I'll keep trolling you... You're making it worth my while...
#58
Posted 18 October 2013 - 01:21 PM
Hagen, on 18 October 2013 - 12:27 PM, said:
I never said you haven't been involved or have spoken up, but clearly you have yet to do it in a manner of civility in the appropriate setting. In all honesty, if I was AD and you spoke to me like you're posting on here, I wouldn't take anything you said seriously. And by talking to the BOE, I don't mean phone calls or chatting 1-on-1. I mean, take the time to attend a BOE meeting with peers who share your opinion, as many as you can for that matter. Until you act in a serious manner in the proper setting, you won't be taken seriously.
Also, I have yet to disagree that CR has a problem. What I'm saying is that how a select group of individuals on here have gone about it is inane. Until adults act like adults and handle this in the appropriate manner, nothing
So you can detect "tone of voice" in a typed message?
#60
Posted 18 October 2013 - 01:29 PM
I alluded to it here, fellas. Unfortunately, I had to dumb it down even more for ya. The list is not from a wsj article, its from a book by Warren Bennis called "On becoming a leader"
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users