281 replies to this topic

[dw629]

PostPlayer, on 02 November 2013 - 03:35 PM, said:

Am I correct in thinking that the Arlington v. Fremont winner plays the winner of Leipsic v. DSJ?

Welcome to the playoffs

[dw629]

PostPlayer, on 02 November 2013 - 02:26 PM, said:

Leipsic is an odd team - Arlington took them to the woodshed in a BIG way at their house losing 49-7 to the Devils, then goes to McComb and wins a close one and Arlington loses to McComb. HS sports - you never know. However, Kuhlman came into the year as the most heralded QB in the league and really struggled (like, real bad) against Arlington in game 4 this year. Apparently, he is coming around now. Certainly he has the skill set to do it. Having said that, if you stacked the 3 BVC schools up to seed them for this playoff - I think most every team in the BVC would have put McComb as the 1 seed, Arlington as the 2 seed and leipsic a distant 3 seed. That's the beauty of HS football. At the end of the day, who cares though...you got to beat everyone at some point.

I bet you McComb and LB disagree with Leipsic being "distant" 3rd.. McComb VB 24-14 does that make McComb look worse.. Leipsic beats McComb puts 44 on board a week later racked 300 yards on LB and moved ball well just couldn't punch it in lost by 3 TD against best team in league.. Arlington lost to McComb and by 2 td to LB could've been worse.. Leipsic is much different since week 5.. 1980s was a LONG time ago so chill out with your once again 7-3 devils .. do something that matters before saying this if I'm not mistaken 8-2 Leipsic tied for 2nd also.. Leipsic blasted Arlington last year there wasn't a huge distance between them last year

Edited by dw629, 02 November 2013 - 04:09 PM.

[PostPlayer]

Roughled some feathers clearly with dw....all I know is that we beat your butts on your field by 42 pts in a game that our JV players were playing the entire fourth quarter. Maybe you get another shot at us but I doubt you get by DSJ. At least Kuhlman punted well against Arlington. Good luck this week.

[dw629]

PostPlayer, on 02 November 2013 - 04:25 PM, said:

Roughled some feathers clearly with dw....all I know is that we beat your butts on your field by 42 pts in a game that our JV players were playing the entire fourth quarter. Maybe you get another shot at us but I doubt you get by DSJ. At least Kuhlman punted well against Arlington. Good luck this week.

Lol were you alive last time Arlington won a conference title?? McComb Leipsic LB CR PG HN all have won MULTIPLE league titles since your last one when leather helmets were worn.. How quickly we forget the beatings you took last few years your field or ours in case you forget

34-3 called in 3rd your field
41-7 score on our JVs our field
50-7 .. 50-0 at halftime your field

It's clear you are not used to competition blowouts happen last year Arlington McComb in season then competed in playoffs. Also, I bet your boy will be 1st team all league AGAIN For 3rd straight year at QB third consecutive year 8 or more wins for him. How many times in last decade have you guys won 8? Hang your hat on that game be proud you should you have nothing else to be proud of on the field over there last 2-3 decades

[Buckshot]

dw629, on 02 November 2013 - 04:07 PM, said:

I bet you McComb and LB disagree with Leipsic being "distant" 3rd.. McComb VB 24-14 does that make McComb look worse.. Leipsic beats McComb puts 44 on board a week later racked 300 yards on LB and moved ball well just couldn't punch it in lost by 3 TD against best team in league.. Arlington lost to McComb and by 2 td to LB could've been worse.. Leipsic is much different since week 5.. 1980s was a LONG time ago so chill out with your once again 7-3 devils .. do something that matters before saying this if I'm not mistaken 8-2 Leipsic tied for 2nd also.. Leipsic blasted Arlington last year there wasn't a huge distance between them last year

i would agree with your assessment. I don't know why Leipsic would think mccomb should be at the top of list. They have a very nice ball team but that matchup was just played two weeks ago and we all know the results. Arlington - Leipsic was six weeks ago. Arlington came in with a veteran team and Leipsic came in still trying to replace 14 seniors from a season ago. Lots of sophomore starters have grown up since that beating. Leipsic is much improved. Can they beat Arlington if given a second chance?? Don't know until we play! But don't expect the same outcome. Interesting fact is Arlington lost 3 of 5 games in the second half of the season all to teams with a winning record. Your two wins came against Vanlue and Cory with an impressive 2-18 record. It sounds to me like your still impressed with a week 4 win over a not very good Leipsic team. My question... Is Arlington better at the end of the season vs the start.

[DirtyPBear76]

Everyone can say anything they want but
1. It's a whole new season

2. What has happened in weeks 1-10 doesn't mean anything now.

3. What was done in past years doesn't matter now.

You can talk about who beat who and who looked bad but come week 11 it is all about being the best on the field on that given night.

[calvert_alum]

Bluetiger76, on 02 November 2013 - 11:21 AM, said:

Those five wins that you mentioned Calvert ended up with to finish the season were against 5 teams with a combined record of 25-25. How much more mediocre can you get?

Actually the 6 wins Calvert has, was to teams that were 29-31.

What is your point with Leipsic?

My point with Leipsic, is that usually a 1 seed is heralded in every region, esp. when playing an 8 seed. However, DSJ will likely be the favorites in this one and should be.

[Bluetiger76]

DirtyPBear76, on 02 November 2013 - 04:42 PM, said:

What has happened in weeks 1-10 doesn't mean anything now.

Actually...it does. Seeding for the 8 teams in each region that made the playoffs, and it unfortunately means a lot to the 100+ teams that missed the playoffs because they didn't win enough games in week 1-10. Just kid'n ya DirtyPB.

Edited by Bluetiger76, 02 November 2013 - 04:52 PM.

[PostPlayer]

Some defensive people on this thread tonight. Bottom line - Region 24 used to be incredibly strong. This year, there is no clear cut favorite. You could almost write the 1 seed from this region to state, but this year we are all pretty much agreeing that the 1 seed (usually a 30 point favorite or more in game 1) is probably going to be an underdog in round 1. Some tough matchups for the top seeded teams this year for sure. My point on Leipsic was simply that rarely do you see a 1 seed lose to a 6 seed by 42 pts on their field in the regular season - thus validating my point that this region is up for grabs (although I still think it boils down to Arlington, DSJ & McComb). Leipsic - prove me wrong, as I hope one of the three BVC teams advances for sure! We will see - good luck to everyone.

[BlueJay]

Go blue jays

[DirtyPBear76]

Bluetiger76, on 02 November 2013 - 04:48 PM, said:

Actually...it does. Seeding for the 8 teams in each region that made the playoffs, and it unfortunately means a lot to the 100+ teams that missed the playoffs because they didn't win enough games in week 1-10. Just kid'n ya DirtyPB.

Touché Bluetiger. Touché. Lol

[BlueJay]

Joe has updated

1. Leipsic
2. McComb
3. FSJSCC
4. Tiffin Calvert
5. Edon
6. Arlington
7. Hicksville
8. DSJ

[redbird]

I think this is the "weakest" team Leipsic has had in the last 4 years. But because the region is really down, they are the #1 seed. I see the bottom 4 seeds winning at least 2 of the 1st round games, and I hope DSJ doesn't win one of them!! But I think they will win 2 maybe 3 post season games. Hope I am wrong, but this region is very "soft"

[DirtyPBear76]

redbird, on 02 November 2013 - 11:13 PM, said:

I think this is the "weakest" team Leipsic has had in the last 4 years. But because the region is really down, they are the #1 seed. I see the bottom 4 seeds winning at least 2 of the 1st round games, and I hope DSJ doesn't win one of them!! But I think they will win 2 maybe 3 post season games. Hope I am wrong, but this region is very "soft"

I sure hope your not basing the weakness of this region off of region 25. Lol

[BlueJay]

redbird, on 02 November 2013 - 11:13 PM, said:

I think this is the "weakest" team Leipsic has had in the last 4 years. But because the region is really down, they are the #1 seed. I see the bottom 4 seeds winning at least 2 of the 1st round games, and I hope DSJ doesn't win one of them!! But I think they will win 2 maybe 3 post season games. Hope I am wrong, but this region is very "soft"

Whoever wins DSJ/leipsic should win the next game with ease IMO

[govikes]

Why does everyone talk of a #1 "seed". The teams are not placed by a human ranking system. The teams have played a schedule and have earned points through competition. If there was a "seeding" system in place I'm sure DSJ would be #1, DSJ jv would be #2, and DSJ jr high would be #3 and Leipsic, McComb, Arlington, Calvert, ranked in the middle and then probably the DSJ midgets #8.
On a serious note, the placement of teams does not in anyway decide the actual talent of the teams, just how their competition fared. Edinborough Ind.? Who the heck knows about them but their 5 wins helped Leipsic earn the top spot.

[PostPlayer]

govikes, on 04 November 2013 - 04:33 PM, said:

Why does everyone talk of a #1 "seed". The teams are not placed by a human ranking system. The teams have played a schedule and have earned points through competition. If there was a "seeding" system in place I'm sure DSJ would be #1, DSJ jv would be #2, and DSJ jr high would be #3 and Leipsic, McComb, Arlington, Calvert, ranked in the middle and then probably the DSJ midgets #8.
On a serious note, the placement of teams does not in anyway decide the actual talent of the teams, just how their competition fared. Edinborough Ind.? Who the heck knows about them but their 5 wins helped Leipsic earn the top spot.

Now this is a good post!

[calvert_alum]

govikes, on 04 November 2013 - 04:33 PM, said:

Why does everyone talk of a #1 "seed". The teams are not placed by a human ranking system. The teams have played a schedule and have earned points through competition. If there was a "seeding" system in place I'm sure DSJ would be #1, DSJ jv would be #2, and DSJ jr high would be #3 and Leipsic, McComb, Arlington, Calvert, ranked in the middle and then probably the DSJ midgets #8.
On a serious note, the placement of teams does not in anyway decide the actual talent of the teams, just how their competition fared. Edinborough Ind.? Who the heck knows about them but their 5 wins helped Leipsic earn the top spot.

LMFAO, thanks for the laugh!

[slice slice baby]

govikes, on 04 November 2013 - 04:33 PM, said:

Why does everyone talk of a #1 "seed". The teams are not placed by a human ranking system. The teams have played a schedule and have earned points through competition. If there was a "seeding" system in place I'm sure DSJ would be #1, DSJ jv would be #2, and DSJ jr high would be #3 and Leipsic, McComb, Arlington, Calvert, ranked in the middle and then probably the DSJ midgets #8.
On a serious note, the placement of teams does not in anyway decide the actual talent of the teams, just how their competition fared. Edinborough Ind.? Who the heck knows about them but their 5 wins helped Leipsic earn the top spot.

Ha-larius!

[samtiger]

slice slice baby, on 05 November 2013 - 05:33 AM, said:

Ha-larius!

i would put dsj midgets in at 7th then calvert almighty could play DSJ