
#81
Posted 03 December 2012 - 12:29 PM
Unlike what you hear of in the media, people have more disposable income today than ever. If you don't believe me, go to a mall, movie theater or restaurant on a Friday or Saturday night. Kids used to frequent McDonal's, Burger King or other fast food or pizza places. Now they are at Outback, Applebee's and other higher profile restaurants. Many of these kids don't even have jobs. Mom and Dad simply foot the bill.
Now, what does that have to do with high school basketball, nothing. It has more to do with parenting.
Kids today do not get pushed at home. I hear too many parents say, "Oh, Johnny (or Suzy) just didn't want to play basketball anymore", I'll support whatever he (or she) wants". Now I'll agree that high school sports isn't the end all-be all, but how many of us would be sick to our stomaches if we didn't have the experience and memories of high school sports?
We've not had enough people convey this message down to their kids. We don't tell kids, "oh, it's ok if you don't study if you don't want to", or "it's ok if you don't want to work or go to Church today". Why not do that with sports??
Any kid should never be made to choose between working and sports. YOu have the rest of your life to work, you have one chance to play high school sports.
And this isn't necessarily a sports thing. Bands, choirs, just regular involvement in school activities is dropping everywhere.
I think high school sports will always be strong in the smaller rural communities. It's easy to get to, it's as inexpensive entertainment as possible, and those communities ties are so, so strong.
#82
Posted 03 December 2012 - 01:04 PM
and said:
"Any kid should never be made to choose between working and sports. "
But if the sport is made to be work, what then?
I don't live in the county any longer but...have two kids who played at a very high level in their sport. They had distractions too but loved their sport and felt zero obligation to play for their parents, city or school. They loved playing! And in the area of the country in which I live, MOST kids don't play a sport in high school. Somehow, someway, they survive. Had either one told me they wanted to quit I would have let them quit.
The greater number of choices available isn't necessarily the problem. It is the inability to properly choose that is the problem (as if I always made the right choice....LOL). And we have to accept that our choice may not always be their choice. As long as they can accept responsibility for the choice, and have made it with eyes wide open, they should be okay.
#83
Posted 03 December 2012 - 02:03 PM
Another question, are the girls programs experiencing the same issues? I was told MC is pretty thin this year, but what about other schools? Didnt OG have a numbers issue just a seaon or two ago? The O'ville thing seems quite odd in the fact that the girls program is one of the top 5 in the state over the past 20 years, yet the boys program is struggling to field a JV team??? On that note, is it true the JV are only playing 2 quarter games??
Edited by erniefurgler, 03 December 2012 - 02:04 PM.
#84
Posted 03 December 2012 - 02:39 PM
bbdad, on 03 December 2012 - 01:04 PM, said:
and said:
"Any kid should never be made to choose between working and sports. "
But if the sport is made to be work, what then?
I don't live in the county any longer but...have two kids who played at a very high level in their sport. They had distractions too but loved their sport and felt zero obligation to play for their parents, city or school. They loved playing! And in the area of the country in which I live, MOST kids don't play a sport in high school. Somehow, someway, they survive. Had either one told me they wanted to quit I would have let them quit.
The greater number of choices available isn't necessarily the problem. It is the inability to properly choose that is the problem (as if I always made the right choice....LOL). And we have to accept that our choice may not always be their choice. As long as they can accept responsibility for the choice, and have made it with eyes wide open, they should be okay.
But you didn't have that decision to make. You can honestly say that if your child was good at a particular sport, and you lived in that community for a long time, the kid played, elementary, jr. high as a starter, used up playing time, you'd just let them walk away in their sophomore year because it's got tougher, or they'd rather socialize more, etc????? I certainly hope not! My point is that kids 14-15-16 years old don't make good decisions, and today we just allow kids to make life altering decisions, and we just let them do it.
I've seen and heard too many kids who are 20-25 years old regret that they didn't do more in high school. I rarely hear someone who looks back now and wishes they didn't do so much in school.
#85
Posted 03 December 2012 - 02:53 PM
I think it's absurd to sit here and blame a community or to blame a high school student on their decisions. As a coach, you need to do what it takes to get kids motivated. Sometimes you may have to change the way you normally do things in order to get numbers. If you don't, then you won't have a team which means you won't be coaching. I understand people will say that a coach should never have to change the way he or she does things in order for a kid to play. If you want kids to play or stay motivated you might have to. Besides maybe part of it has to do with kids and trying to find time to work during school. Who knows? If a kid doesn't want to play for a certain coach, that is their choice. And that goes back to me saying that a coach just may have to change the way they do things. But let's not sit here and criticize a community as if some of you know a thing or to about them.
#86
Posted 03 December 2012 - 03:05 PM
#87
Posted 03 December 2012 - 03:16 PM
Mysterio, on 03 December 2012 - 02:53 PM, said:
I think it's absurd to sit here and blame a community or to blame a high school student on their decisions. As a coach, you need to do what it takes to get kids motivated. Sometimes you may have to change the way you normally do things in order to get numbers. If you don't, then you won't have a team which means you won't be coaching. I understand people will say that a coach should never have to change the way he or she does things in order for a kid to play. If you want kids to play or stay motivated you might have to. Besides maybe part of it has to do with kids and trying to find time to work during school. Who knows? If a kid doesn't want to play for a certain coach, that is their choice. And that goes back to me saying that a coach just may have to change the way they do things. But let's not sit here and criticize a community as if some of you know a thing or to about them.
What if that kid doesn't want to play for a coach? Or doesn't want to play with that other kid? Do you think they are going to always like their boss later in life, or their co-workers??? Of course not, but many just allow their kids to walk away.
#88
Posted 03 December 2012 - 03:24 PM
erniefurgler, on 03 December 2012 - 02:03 PM, said:
Another question, are the girls programs experiencing the same issues? I was told MC is pretty thin this year, but what about other schools? Didnt OG have a numbers issue just a seaon or two ago? The O'ville thing seems quite odd in the fact that the girls program is one of the top 5 in the state over the past 20 years, yet the boys program is struggling to field a JV team??? On that note, is it true the JV are only playing 2 quarter games??
And actually with the girls, it's even worse. Many teams have less than 15 kids varsity and JV combined, some don't even have enough for Jv games. You would think with this generation of parents, directly affected by Title XI, that you'd have more female athletes, and it just has not happened. Again, I think you especially see the girls parents almost celebrate when Suzy says she doesn't want to play basketball anymore.
#89
Posted 03 December 2012 - 06:36 PM
I don't think you are taking into consideration that High School sports, especially basketball, has turned into a 12 month sport. The students don't have time to go on family vacations or even get a summer job. By talking to many athletes, this is why they consider basketball to be their least favorite sport.
Years back you never had the open gyms, camps, mandatory workouts, etc. It has gotten so bad that there are a few schools mandating that there will be absolutely no "practice" of any kind during certain parts of the summer.
On a side note, I feel this is why ACME baseball is going by the wayside. If an athlete has to choose between an ACME game or a basketball practice, they feel they must go to basketball or fear getting punished by the basketball coach.
As someone earlier said, a coach must be a motivator. The days of throwing the balls out on the gym floor and expecting the kids to bust their butt for you is over. You must make the kids want to play for you. (Continental - Homier).
Just my thoughts on it.
#90
Posted 03 December 2012 - 09:25 PM
HRC, on 03 December 2012 - 06:36 PM, said:
I don't think you are taking into consideration that High School sports, especially basketball, has turned into a 12 month sport. The students don't have time to go on family vacations or even get a summer job. By talking to many athletes, this is why they consider basketball to be their least favorite sport.
Years back you never had the open gyms, camps, mandatory workouts, etc. It has gotten so bad that there are a few schools mandating that there will be absolutely no "practice" of any kind during certain parts of the summer.
On a side note, I feel this is why ACME baseball is going by the wayside. If an athlete has to choose between an ACME game or a basketball practice, they feel they must go to basketball or fear getting punished by the basketball coach.
As someone earlier said, a coach must be a motivator. The days of throwing the balls out on the gym floor and expecting the kids to bust their butt for you is over. You must make the kids want to play for you. (Continental - Homier).
Just my thoughts on it.
And I do agree with you on the the baseball thoughts. We've turned basketball and football into predominant sports in the summer, when it should be baseball. Basketball team camps and football 7/7's rule the summer anymore.
#91
Posted 04 December 2012 - 07:16 AM
erniefurgler, on 03 December 2012 - 02:03 PM, said:
Great point.
My kids have commented on how goofy i look in them short shorts on the team photos of years past dotting the school hallways.

Yet i sense the hometown pride in the way they approach their school be it in the classroom are in a sport.
There is a price tag to chasing that dollar.
HRC, on 03 December 2012 - 06:36 PM, said:
spot on.

#92
Posted 04 December 2012 - 07:23 PM
#93
Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:16 AM
#94
Posted 05 December 2012 - 10:30 AM
buckeyes_0, on 05 December 2012 - 12:16 AM, said:
Kalida 1-1
Continental 1-1
Ottoville 1-0
FJ 0-2
Grove 1-0
Pandora won one game don't know if that's all they played so far or not
Haven't caught any wind from leipsic yet
#95
Posted 05 December 2012 - 11:38 AM
Leipsic 1-0
#98
Posted 10 December 2012 - 10:55 PM
I know theres been people saying schools should consolidate, which financially they should have becuase there are $20 million schools just miles apart from each other, i know small schools do better than larger school and im a supporter of the small schools, but what if schools went together for just sports in the county...(i know it wont happen -for atleast a LONG time anyway) How would that go? MC/Leipsic Pandora/Grove Ottoville/FJ Kalida/Continental?
#99
Posted 10 December 2012 - 11:23 PM
NW Ohio Guy, on 10 December 2012 - 10:55 PM, said:
Miller City, Continental and Ft. Jennings do not have numbers problems, all 3 schools have freshman teams. This seems to only be a problem at Ottoville at the present time.
#100
Posted 22 March 2013 - 07:02 PM
Maltese Falcon, on 10 October 2012 - 08:50 PM, said:
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users