
#41
Posted 20 November 2012 - 12:11 AM
#42
Posted 20 November 2012 - 03:25 PM
Is CYO more pick up ball with no practices and little structure? Just show up and play?
#43
Posted 20 November 2012 - 10:06 PM
#44
Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:56 PM
PowerPressure, on 20 November 2012 - 10:06 PM, said:
Hold on guys before you lose your pants, Ottoville has a varsity team this year just not a JV team.
Common Sense, on 20 November 2012 - 03:25 PM, said:
Is CYO more pick up ball with no practices and little structure? Just show up and play?
Basically, yes.
#45
Posted 21 November 2012 - 01:05 PM
#46
Posted 21 November 2012 - 11:36 PM
#47
Posted 22 November 2012 - 09:35 AM
Once again, not blaming the new coach just wandering why all of a sudden very few want to play basketball at Ottoville?
One last thing; the girls program at Ottoville is one of the best in the state in Division IV. These girls are growing up in the same families/environment as the boys are. The girls seem to want to put the time and work into the program to be successful, I would think the boys would be also under the right circumstances.
#48
Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:08 AM
Venom, would you work for someone who belittled you, called you worthless day in and day out or would you go in search of a job where your talents were appreciated? And these kids don't get paid... Why shouldn't sports at this level be both challenging and fun? Getting rid of CYO doesn't solve your problems. These kids need an outlet. Getting rid of CYO just takes away from the kids who want to play but may not have as much talent as the next kid. I do not believe for an instant that these kids are lazy. Coaches should be role models not drill sergeants.
#49
Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:56 AM
#50
Posted 22 November 2012 - 10:28 PM
#51
Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:11 PM
JohnMcClane, on 22 November 2012 - 10:28 PM, said:
Well said!
#52
Posted 23 November 2012 - 10:33 AM
#53
Posted 23 November 2012 - 12:29 PM
#54
Posted 24 November 2012 - 07:52 PM
#55
Posted 25 November 2012 - 06:13 AM
Ottoville not liking a tough coach?
Let's hope Kalida don't get wind of this. Looking for the next heir to the throne.
Dejavu
#56
Posted 26 November 2012 - 07:47 AM
BUCKEYESROCK, on 22 November 2012 - 11:08 AM, said:
Venom, would you work for someone who belittled you, called you worthless day in and day out or would you go in search of a job where your talents were appreciated? And these kids don't get paid... Why shouldn't sports at this level be both challenging and fun? Getting rid of CYO doesn't solve your problems. These kids need an outlet. Getting rid of CYO just takes away from the kids who want to play but may not have as much talent as the next kid. I do not believe for an instant that these kids are lazy. Coaches should be role models not drill sergeants.
Actually getting rid of CYO would solve part of the problem. It may not actually get kids to play high school ball, but it at least shows discipline and strict action meaning if you want to play basketball, you will play high school. I do agree though about the CYO thing in your last few sentences. CYO should be there for an outlet (for the kids that don't make the team or just don't have as much talent as the next kid). But this is not the case BUCKEYESROCK. In the last 7-8 years or more, I have seen good talent quit high school ball and play CYO. There is no reason for a small school like Ottoville to have 2 CYO teams. People always want to blame the coach if kids don't wanna go out. I think some often exagerrate about how strict a coach gets, one kid may think he is a drill sargeant while the other kid doesn't think that way. I want to play for a coach that wants to win, wants the best of me and pushes me to make me better. I think kids are just too soft and lazy these days, bottom line.
Edited by Venom, 26 November 2012 - 07:47 AM.
#57
Posted 26 November 2012 - 10:55 PM
#58
Posted 27 November 2012 - 05:55 PM

Leipsic 18-4 (6-1)
Grove 17-5 (5-2)
Continental 18-4 (4-3)
Miller City 17-5 (4-3)
Kalida 15-7 (3-4)
FJ 12-10 (2-5)
Ottoville 11-11 (2-5)
PG 9-13 (2-5)
#59
Posted 27 November 2012 - 06:33 PM
Passion, on 27 November 2012 - 05:55 PM, said:

Leipsic 18-4 (6-1)
Grove 17-5 (5-2)
Continental 18-4 (4-3)
Miller City 17-5 (4-3)
Kalida 15-7 (3-4)
FJ 12-10 (2-5)
Ottoville 11-11 (2-5)
PG 9-13 (2-5)
who's going to beat Leipsic and Grove?
#60
Posted 27 November 2012 - 06:34 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users