
Change to Rule 4-1-1b
#21
Posted 05 February 2012 - 08:04 PM
@OSU Yes, Mr. Koski explained both rhyme and reason. You may not like it or agree with it. Tough.
How many teams does this impact? OG had a yellow home kit the last few years. Anyone else?
#22
Posted 06 February 2012 - 09:01 AM
dkusma96, on 05 February 2012 - 08:04 PM, said:
@OSU Yes, Mr. Koski explained both rhyme and reason. You may not like it or agree with it. Tough.
How many teams does this impact? OG had a yellow home kit the last few years. Anyone else?
Call it whining if you like....there many rules that should be addressed. This one right or wrong is very trivial. Refs need to worry more about educating themselves better and their own fitness and worry less about the color of team uniforms. Any color conflict should be handled between schools. I know OG contacted any school that might be in conflict with their yellow home uni....Wouldn't be suprised to see yellow become their new away kit if this rule sticks....!
#23
Posted 06 February 2012 - 02:14 PM
Goin2goal, on 06 February 2012 - 09:01 AM, said:
Such as............? You are correct that this is trivial and people shouldn't whine about it.
Goin2goal, on 06 February 2012 - 09:01 AM, said:
I would. Last time I checked yellow is not dark.
Goin2goal, on 06 February 2012 - 09:01 AM, said:
Referees just enforce the laws of the game.
#24
Posted 09 February 2012 - 09:11 AM

This is about as stupid as the rule in basketball that if you girls where head bands to keep their hair up they must all be the same color, and they must match the uniform. Because lord knows having to many different colored hair bands makes it tough to ref a game.
Really, even a team wears yellow and anther team wears light blue..It is still yellow and blue....
I was learned my colors back in preschool....(grammer still working on

Edited by gamekeeper, 09 February 2012 - 09:17 AM.
#25
Posted 13 February 2012 - 09:59 AM
dkusma96, on 05 February 2012 - 08:04 PM, said:
@OSU Yes, Mr. Koski explained both rhyme and reason. You may not like it or agree with it. Tough.
How many teams does this impact? OG had a yellow home kit the last few years. Anyone else?
Its a very good point most schools anymore just go with the white uniforms for home instead of the yellow, orange or whatever light color they use. According to the rule change, it will impact more schools than you think. I am under the impression (unless they have made some changes to this rule) that all white uniforms have to be solid white. No stripes or have any partial color on the uniforms. You can't even have a 1/8" stripe running down the side of your uniforms. If thats still true I am not ok with that. If they want to enforce the white uniforms for home and a darker color for away, thats fine with me. But to say it has to be a solid white with no other color (with the exception of numbers/team name) is a bit absurd. I don't think its really a big deal either. But if some schools just recently purcahsed new uniforms or schools that don't necessarily need new ones, then it might be to them.
Edited by Mysterio, 13 February 2012 - 10:19 AM.
#26
Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:09 AM
Mysterio, on 13 February 2012 - 09:59 AM, said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this has been in the works for a few years now so that schools could replace their home kit within a normal cycle.
#27
Posted 15 February 2012 - 07:58 AM
dkusma96, on 14 February 2012 - 02:09 AM, said:
Yes that is very true it has been in the discussions for I think 2 years. But what I'm saying is you asked what other schools would this impact besides O-G. Well just about every school unless your home kit is solid white with no stripe or any other color on it. I can't think of too many schools that don't have some sort of stripe or color other than white on their jersey (besides the numbers and lettering). Now I don't know exactly the specifics of the home jersey like I mentioned but thats just what I heard so I could be wrong.
#28
Posted 20 February 2012 - 02:48 PM
#29
Posted 21 February 2012 - 11:56 AM
Demise, on 20 February 2012 - 02:48 PM, said:
Not sure I support that...esp with the quality of officials! I most cases (not all) the soft red would be equivalent of fouling out of a basketball game. You don't see an ejection for two personal foul calls in football.
Good call Mysterio, on affecting all schools. The NF guy did say (if memory serves) that shorts could be colored....Which makes me wonder why even bother. Which brings me back to my original thought, if a school uses yellow (for example) for their home kit, it is their responsibility to make sure there is no conflict. If their is, it is their responsibility to change...
#30
Posted 21 February 2012 - 01:55 PM
Demise, on 20 February 2012 - 02:48 PM, said:
While it's a fair rule change consistent with FIFA, I do have reservations. I do agree that a team should play down a man if a player is sent off either "soft" or "hard," but does an red for cautions on a goal celebration and a blurted out "oh *******" warrant a 2 match ban?
On the whole however, I don't think it'll be too big a change. Players should simply adjust accordingly once they go into the book.
G2G, actually a football player/coach is ejected in for 2 personal fouls (unsportsmanlike conduct). You don't see a player ejected for two personal fouls in soccer, as there are no personal fouls in soccer.
#31
Posted 22 February 2012 - 11:35 AM
#32
Posted 22 February 2012 - 11:48 AM
Goin2goal, on 21 February 2012 - 11:56 AM, said:
Ya I just don't see the need of change. All it takes is communication and observation to make this work. I remember about 7 years ago a home team wore yellow for their home kit and the visiting team happen to wear yellow as well. So the home team had to wear pinnies. Now that easily couldve been solved with a little communication or observation on the coaches part. Basically this is what the rule change consists of in case no one has read the memo:
"The current NFHS rule is that the home team is to wear “white or light” colored shirts and socks. There is
no restriction on the color of the shorts. The 2013 change requires that the home team wear all white
shirts and socks. In other words, the light color option is going away. Of course, the numbers, school
name, player name and any other markings should be in a contrasting color. “All white” excludes any
colored side panels, colored piping around the sleeves or neck, etc. Obviously, this also prohibits shirts
with stripes as a home uniform."
Just not a big fan that the uniforms have to be "all white" but oh well it is what it is.
#33
Posted 22 February 2012 - 04:16 PM
Edited by crew_ton, 22 February 2012 - 04:19 PM.
#34
Posted 22 February 2012 - 06:30 PM
crew_ton, on 22 February 2012 - 04:16 PM, said:
A "blue card" rule would be extremely cumbersome. It would require a 3rd or 4th official to simply manage players coming in and out of the penalty box. It would cause confusion among players, coaches and officials alike on what is a simple foul, what's a blue, what's a caution, ect. The delays in play would be very annoying to everyone.
The impact would be really negligible as being a man down for 2 minutes is not really a big deal in the high school outdoor game. Lastly, officials already have all the tools they need to control a game: 1. A whistle. 2. A mouth. 3. A card to caution. 4. A card to send off.
#35
Posted 23 February 2012 - 07:39 AM
#36
Posted 23 February 2012 - 08:23 AM
The "soft" red I have mixed feelings on. But would not argue either way, because I can see both sides, and they are valid points.
#37
Posted 16 August 2012 - 06:00 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users