Jump to content



Division II Lima Sr. Sectional


2 replies to this topic

#1 Prince

    All District

  • Members
  • 222 posts

    Joined: 05-January 18
    Member No.: 9937

Posted 06 February 2018 - 02:32 PM

This is simply for conversation! With the tournament draw on Sunday, this is what I have come up with for this sectional.......

#1 Wauseon - First Round Bye
#2 Elida - First Round Bye

#3 Wapak vs. #14 Toledo Scott
#4 Shawnee vs. #12 Celina
#5 Kenton vs. #9 Bryan
#6 Van Wert vs. #10 St. Mary's
#7 Bath vs. #8 Defiance
#11 Maumee vs. #13 Napoleon

*Don't kill me here, this is completely a guess, and i'm sure will be entirely wrong come Sunday afternoon. I just ranked the 14 teams based on their record and then plugged them into a 14-team bracket just to have some fun with it. I think it's going to be a very fun, competitive sectionals with some very close games. My personal opinion, I would watch out for Wapak and possibly even Van Wert to make some noise and maybe even pull of an upset or two. What's everyone's thoughts?


#2 Outspoken

    Hall of Fame

  • Members
  • 1,095 posts

    Joined: 22-January 06
    Member No.: 243

Posted 06 February 2018 - 04:10 PM

I don’t think you’re too far off Prince. I wonder if Van Wert will get a little more love since they are playing so well right now? Just a thought. Obviously Wauseon and Elida are the favorites. Really like this Wauseon team.....they might be better than they were last year!

#3 flounder

    Stinkys Legend

  • [M] Moderator
  • 8,880 posts

    Joined: 01-January 06
    Member No.: 23
  • Location:Delta House---Faber College

Posted 06 February 2018 - 04:12 PM

Prince....

I agree that Wapakoneta or Van Wert could surprise anybody.....both seem to be coming on right now, while Elida seems to be struggling.....Wauseon is definitely the one seed and Elida the 2 probably, but not playing like the 2 seed.....watch Celina also, but anyone’s guess as it is almost a WBL tournament!!!!!







1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users