Marion Local, Coldwater, Minster .....what's their secret?
#1
Posted 01 December 2014 - 12:33 PM
#2
Posted 01 December 2014 - 02:03 PM
#3
Posted 01 December 2014 - 03:01 PM
Now what's their secret? I agree with the above poster to a degree. It also has to do with the water
and milk they drink.....next to church steeples, the tallest structures in Mercer Co. are the silos
they put the dairy feed in....
good ole-fashioned farm boys AND girls....not afraid of hard work, not afraid to take criticism, able
to follow directions, and come from solid family cultures....the coaching also cannot be overlooked.
Top to bottom, side to side, the MAC has the BEST coaches and philosophies......period!! Wish we had
just a little bit of that rub off up here in Pandora......the good Lord knows we need it....RM
#4
Posted 01 December 2014 - 03:58 PM
Solidly middle-class households with two parents - not all, but definitely most kids have these
Excellent coaching - speaks for itself
Good work ethic - the farm background gets a lot of deserved credit here, but ironically few kids these days are actually part of farming families
Athletic kids - not sure if the mostly-German heritage explanation is sound, but kids around here seem to be larger than most
Respectful kids that are raised right - again, not all fall in this category, but they generally take coaching well and that coaching gets support at home as well
Momentum - success breeds more success, and don't forget about the 20 extra weeks of practice the CW and ML kids have gotten over the past four years
And the thing is...it's not just CW and ML that have all of these ingredients. I would argue that St. Henry has all of the essentials also, and they had quite a run of success in the 90's and 00's, but in order to truly get back on track they're going to have to unseat one of their neighbors.
#5
Posted 01 December 2014 - 04:05 PM
FlightCrew, on 01 December 2014 - 12:33 PM, said:
Most of the things said above are true. I would add: 1) Unusually big strong farm boys (genetics) 2) The largest league in the state without any boys soccer. 3) Freshmen practice and dress Fridays with team. 3) The best programs have excellent coaching and everyone from 7th grade up is on the same page. 4) Most have no organized football until until 7th grade. 5) Most are not concerned about wins and losses in Jr. high, just playing and developing as many players as possible. 6) Everyone is related to everyone and nobody wants to lose to your cousin. Brings out the best in competition;) 7) Expectations are high because your dad/mom/brother/sister has already won a state title 8) coaches of other sports work together so less kids specialize in one sport. 9) Coaches can also be administrators at most schools so they are getting paid $70-85 thousand dollars to stay. 10) The demographics of most MAC schools mirror the demographics of most private schools.
Edited by Bigdogg79, 01 December 2014 - 04:08 PM.
#6
Posted 01 December 2014 - 04:35 PM
#7
Posted 01 December 2014 - 06:27 PM
paperboy, on 01 December 2014 - 03:58 PM, said:
Athletic kids - not sure if the mostly-German heritage explanation is sound, but kids around here seem to be larger than most
a run of success in the 90's and 00's, but in order to truly get back on track they're going to have to unseat one of their neighbors.
First off, the MAC is in a league all their own (bad pun), and has been forever. And, I totally agree with most all the reasoning posted thus far. Winning simply breed winners. They seem to reload every year, not rebuild.
But I did do a little investigating on the German heritage comment. I have heard that theory before and never quite "got it". a lot of communities in this part of the state are German heritage. In doing some research on several sites (including wiki) the average heights of most US and German Males are right at 5-11 or so. The weight according to the studies done in the mid 2000's showed the average German male at 182 pounds and the average US male at 194 pounds. Maybe the German heritage factor is valid if we weigh them in high school before they get fat.
#8
Posted 01 December 2014 - 06:46 PM
#9
Posted 01 December 2014 - 06:47 PM
Rajaha, on 01 December 2014 - 02:03 PM, said:
AAAAMMMMMEEEEEEENNNNN!!!!!!!!!
#10
Posted 01 December 2014 - 07:53 PM
#11
Posted 01 December 2014 - 08:14 PM
Bottom line is people in MAC land care about the success of their schools, and by extension their sports teams, and when you care that much about something you will be bound and determined to make sure you are successful.
#12
Posted 01 December 2014 - 08:20 PM
Michael Jordan
#13
Posted 01 December 2014 - 09:50 PM
Obviously way more to it than that. Thanks!
#14
Posted 01 December 2014 - 09:55 PM
Bluetiger76, on 01 December 2014 - 06:27 PM, said:
First off, the MAC is in a league all their own (bad pun), and has been forever. And, I totally agree with most all the reasoning posted thus far. Winning simply breed winners. They seem to reload every year, not rebuild.
But I did do a little investigating on the German heritage comment. I have heard that theory before and never quite "got it". a lot of communities in this part of the state are German heritage. In doing some research on several sites (including wiki) the average heights of most US and German Males are right at 5-11 or so. The weight according to the studies done in the mid 2000's showed the average German male at 182 pounds and the average US male at 194 pounds. Maybe the German heritage factor is valid if we weigh them in high school before they get fat.
There are different genetic pools outside of just being German. Look at hitler with the Aryan race he wanted to cement in the world. A lot of those communities just so happened to acquire those genes and when nobody really moves into those communities, you just see the same names year in and year out in all sports. Call it inbreeding to an extent, but the towns are small and the neighboring ones have similar genetic pools. St Henry had like 3 girls that were 6"7" on their volleyball team on one of their good teams. I went to a st Henry/LCC game at st Henry back in the day and I'm pretty sure I was the shortest one on that entire side of the field male or female. I think the year they won state, they had the hemmelgarn kid and he was a defective shorty but even he was athletically gifted despite his defect of being average sized.
#15
Posted 01 December 2014 - 09:56 PM
Dakota Green, on 01 December 2014 - 07:53 PM, said:
If that's true somebody in the Chickasaw area owes me about $150.
#16
Posted 02 December 2014 - 04:43 AM
#17
Posted 02 December 2014 - 08:13 AM
#18
Posted 02 December 2014 - 11:15 AM
#19
Posted 02 December 2014 - 11:28 AM
Bigdogg79, on 02 December 2014 - 11:15 AM, said:
I totally agree, and it's always driven me a little nuts to hear that.. Hard work is necessary but in my opinion, all the other ingredients are just as necessary and if one of them goes the dynasty can end quickly. Now coaching is the one that can go away in a hurry, but a considerable talent drop over the span of a couple classes could do it as well.
One more thing I want to point out...some schools may already have the six key characteristics that I pointed to, and still not have the success that ML and CW do. That's because there is also a little bit of luck involved. In every single one of ML's seven state championship seasons, there is at least one game I can point to that could have gone the other way due to a bit of luck, and if it had, the Flyers wouldn't have won state that year. So yes, luck has something to do with it.
#20
Posted 03 December 2014 - 10:28 AM
Secondly, it is a culture of winning. The kids know how to finish the big games, as the classes before them have done. The coaches get them into the position, the kids finish it. It is superior execution in two areas.
A lot of teams seem to choke, play off their game, or become overly nervous when in big spots, does not happen often with MAC kids.
I do not agree with the genetics/work ethic items. Sure some schools have poor work ethic, but a lot of top schools have great work ethic. Does not always equal success at high levels (which is what we are discussing, high level success separates the MAC from everyone else).
Genetics wise, you would be hard pressed to prove this. I think it is frankly a bad argument, almost sounds like an excuse used by those who lose to the MAC.
Edited by theWanderer, 03 December 2014 - 10:29 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users