Lakers

Started by OTCONFANS, Feb 01 2010 10:19 AM

You cannot reply to this topic
Go to first unread post

11 replies to this topic

#1 OTCONFANS

All League

Members
61 posts

Joined:

Member No.:

Location:continental

Posted 01 February 2010 - 10:19 AM

any thoughts i kinda like the lakers amazing team amazing bench and they are what tied for first in the nba standing Lets go lakers

Edited by OTCONFANS, 01 February 2010 - 10:21 AM.

Back to top

#2 FrOnT RoW JOE

Stinkys Legend

[M] Moderator
7,940 posts

Joined:

Member No.:

Posted 01 February 2010 - 10:48 AM

LeBron and the Cavs are better.....

You'll be proud of our young people in the classroom, in the community, and most especially in 310 days in Ann Arbor, Michigan on the football field. - Jim Tressel

Back to top

#3 OTCONFANS

All League

Members
61 posts

Joined:

Member No.:

Location:continental

Posted 01 February 2010 - 11:00 AM

i dont think so FRJ cavs are good but not like the lakers

Back to top

#4 Easton

All State

Members
832 posts

Joined:

Member No.:

Location:Frickin Ottawa

Posted 01 February 2010 - 11:46 PM

I'm a huge Cavs fan and an even bigger LBJ fan but I would put the Cavs behind the Lakers, Magic and Celtics right now.

Back to top

#5 FrOnT RoW JOE

Stinkys Legend

[M] Moderator
7,940 posts

Joined:

Member No.:

Posted 01 February 2010 - 11:50 PM

Celtics, for real? they are struggling terrible....By the way Cavs are 38-11 best record in the NBA lakers are 37-12....If I was being Honest, I would probably take the Lakers over Cavs, but not Celtics and Magic...

You'll be proud of our young people in the classroom, in the community, and most especially in 310 days in Ann Arbor, Michigan on the football field. - Jim Tressel

Back to top

#6 cubbies4life

Hall of Fame

Members
1,133 posts

Joined:

Member No.:

Location:Findlay

Posted 02 February 2010 - 07:57 PM

QUOTE (FrOnT RoW JOE @ Feb 1 2010, 11:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Celtics, for real? they are struggling terrible....By the way Cavs are 38-11 best record in the NBA lakers are 37-12....If I was being Honest, I would probably take the Lakers over Cavs, but not Celtics and Magic...

I do not like the Lakers one bit. Liked their head coach when he coached another team. But the Lakers are in the west which has many more quality teams then the east. Taking nothing away from the Cavs because right now they are the best in the East handily. But the who has a better record can not be compared realistically.

Back to top

#7 scoop27

All District

Members
173 posts

Joined:

Member No.:

Posted 04 February 2010 - 04:46 PM

It may not be just this simple ... then again, maybe it is.

Two meetings between Cavaliers and Lakers this year. Cavs are 2-0.

You can say what you want about this conference being tougher, or that team being deeper, or whatever coach being better, smarter. But head-to-head, Cavs are 2-0 against the Lakers this season (including a butt-whooping on Christmas Day), and you cannot discount that fact.

Back to top

#8 cubbies4life

Hall of Fame

Members
1,133 posts

Joined:

Member No.:

Location:Findlay

Posted 04 February 2010 - 09:06 PM

QUOTE (scoop27 @ Feb 4 2010, 04:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

It may not be just this simple ... then again, maybe it is.

Two meetings between Cavaliers and Lakers this year. Cavs are 2-0.

You can say what you want about this conference being tougher, or that team being deeper, or whatever coach being better, smarter. But head-to-head, Cavs are 2-0 against the Lakers this season (including a butt-whooping on Christmas Day), and you cannot discount that fact.

2 games does not say who is better. I am not a Laker fan one bit. I rather see Cleveland beat them.

Back to top

#9 scoop27

All District

Members
173 posts

Joined:

Member No.:

Posted 08 February 2010 - 11:00 PM

No, two games doesn't necessarily determine who is better ... but it sure doesn't hurt. The fact remains, in the games scheduled between Cleveland and L.A. this season, the Cavs are 2-0. Instead of conjecture, we have solid facts to go on, and that's a 2-0 record.

Starting 5, I believe the Lakers might be a hair better, just because they have some versatile bigs. But the Cavs win with a slightly better/deeper bench.

Edited by scoop27, 08 February 2010 - 11:00 PM.

Back to top

#10 TiGgEr3

Hall of Fame

Members
2,819 posts

Joined:

Member No.:

Location:Spencerville, Ohio

Posted 13 May 2010 - 11:53 PM

QUOTE (FrOnT RoW JOE @ Feb 2 2010, 12:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Celtics, for real? they are struggling terrible....By the way Cavs are 38-11 best record in the NBA lakers are 37-12....If I was being Honest, I would probably take the Lakers over Cavs, but not Celtics and Magic...

Yes, yes they are.

Don't find fault, find a remedy.
Henry Ford

Back to top

#11 slice slice baby

Stinkys Legend

[A] Administrator
38,681 posts

Joined:

Member No.:

Location:Where you want me

Posted 31 May 2010 - 05:08 AM

QUOTE (Easton @ Feb 2 2010, 12:31 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I'm a huge Cavs fan and an even bigger LBJ fan but I would put the Cavs behind the Lakers, Magic and Celtics right now.

Start of February.....

not bad.....

"Forever never seems that long ~~until you're grown"
Bandido- November 24, 1957- August 12th, 2011.....RIP, my good friend... things will never be the same here without you. :(
Gonemad -June 26th, 1962-May 13th, 2008
sliceslicebaby@facebook.com
sliceslicebaby@twitter.com