Jump to content



Wake Forest (13-11) at #2 Duke (23-1) 2/14


8 replies to this topic

#1 dawger

    Hall of Fame

  • Members
  • 2,953 posts

    Joined: 02-January 06
    Member No.: 43
  • Location:Elida

Posted 13 February 2006 - 05:50 PM

The Demon Deacons are not playing well at all, so should they even travel to Duke???........I mean they WILL get smashed won't they???....... unsure.gif ..........of course they will!!!......... dry.gif .......... cool.gif
Philippians 4:13

DAWGER


#2 diehardwarrior

    Hall of Fame

  • Members
  • 1,784 posts

    Joined: 02-January 06
    Member No.: 39
  • Location:SE Ohio (the only one)

Posted 13 February 2006 - 05:59 PM

dawger, my pal, my amigo...you should know that with the ACC anything can happen, they are all big rivals and big games to watch....maybe that is what you ment and had a sarcastic post...every since they played MY mounties in the tourney they havent done too well (of course they did lose that one kid Paul something or other, oh yeah Chris Paul wink.gif )
QUOTE(dawger @ Jan 31 2006, 06:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Getting there at 4:30 surely allows you to have the name of diehardwarrior......

#3 dawger

    Hall of Fame

  • Members
  • 2,953 posts

    Joined: 02-January 06
    Member No.: 43
  • Location:Elida

Posted 13 February 2006 - 06:03 PM

diehard,

I know what you mean........Wake has lost what seems to be a million close games.......but they lost to Duke at HOME earlier this year 82-64.........not a good sign IMO.......... ohmy.gif .......... cool.gif
Philippians 4:13

DAWGER

#4 weezy

    All District

  • Members
  • 135 posts

    Joined: 08-February 06
    Member No.: 385
  • Location:PH alumni

Posted 15 February 2006 - 01:00 PM

i would like to see Wake Forest win but i know Duke will win

Edited by weezy, 15 February 2006 - 01:01 PM.


#5 FrOnT RoW JOE

    Stinkys Legend

  • [M] Moderator
  • 7,939 posts

    Joined: 07-February 06
    Member No.: 368
  • Location:Continental

Posted 15 February 2006 - 01:02 PM

Sorry Wake Forrest fans I have to go with Duke on this one.....I just dont think that they can handle Duke....
You'll be proud of our young people in the classroom, in the community, and most especially in 310 days in Ann Arbor, Michigan on the football field. - Jim Tressel

#6 dawger

    Hall of Fame

  • Members
  • 2,953 posts

    Joined: 02-January 06
    Member No.: 43
  • Location:Elida

Posted 15 February 2006 - 05:32 PM

front row joe,

laugh.gif ........the game was played last night!!!...and of course, as expected, Duke was victorious........93-70...........Wake is a very young and inexperienced team.........Just Give Skip Prosser a year or two.......and he will have these guys back up to the top and in contention!!!........ cool.gif
Philippians 4:13

DAWGER

#7 diehardwarrior

    Hall of Fame

  • Members
  • 1,784 posts

    Joined: 02-January 06
    Member No.: 39
  • Location:SE Ohio (the only one)

Posted 15 February 2006 - 09:16 PM

over in chapel hill they have a young team and kept up with the big boys at duke....you cant use that as your excuse dawger wink.gif
QUOTE(dawger @ Jan 31 2006, 06:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Getting there at 4:30 surely allows you to have the name of diehardwarrior......

#8 dawger

    Hall of Fame

  • Members
  • 2,953 posts

    Joined: 02-January 06
    Member No.: 43
  • Location:Elida

Posted 16 February 2006 - 05:52 PM

Let's just say Wake does not recruit the cream of the crop every year, like a UNC......so it will take them a few years or so to gain the experience to compete in the always tough ACC.......... wink.gif cool.gif
Philippians 4:13

DAWGER

#9 diehardwarrior

    Hall of Fame

  • Members
  • 1,784 posts

    Joined: 02-January 06
    Member No.: 39
  • Location:SE Ohio (the only one)

Posted 16 February 2006 - 09:57 PM

i would agree...chris paul was good wink.gif
QUOTE(dawger @ Jan 31 2006, 06:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Getting there at 4:30 surely allows you to have the name of diehardwarrior......







1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users