![](http://rocketcorner.com/forums/public/style_images/rc2/icon_users.png)
Does it matter the size of school when getting recruited?
#1
Posted 11 September 2012 - 10:58 AM
A conversation came up with some friends and I am curious to see your thoughts. If coaching is the same (which it can be great or not great at both levels), is a kid more likely to develop into a D1 college player at a D1 or D2 high school?
#2
Posted 11 September 2012 - 11:16 AM
#3
Posted 11 September 2012 - 11:25 AM
Some D-4 TO D-6 guys that come to mind in the past 5 years that are now playing D-1
Zac Dysert (Ada) Miami (OH), probably going to the NFL
Briggs Orsbon (Crestview) - Ball State, I believe led them in receiving more than once including when they were 12-2 in 2008
Jordan Thompson (Parkway) - Ohio, starting TE
The Homan Brothers (Coldwater) - Ross had an outstanding career, little brother is still at Ohio State
Ty O'Conner (LCC) - Michigan St.
Maty Mauk (Kenton) - Missouri
I think that bigger schools get more attention because there is more selection. But, I think the small schools (especially around us) put more emphasis on sports because that is all we have. I don't think the size of school has anything to do with it, I think it is the quality of the program.
#4
Posted 11 September 2012 - 12:39 PM
1: Scouting in cities is much easier
2: Potential recruits play against better competition which illustrates a more confirmed stance as a prospect playing at the next level. Sure, you may be a 5'9" D6 QB that dominates, but that doesn't mean anything at the next level or even if you were in D1 HS ball. Same goes for lineman. You might have a good 6'4" 260lb lineman in D6 tearing it up...but how does he fare against a D-lineman his own size as opposed to most of the 5'9" 190lb D6 D-linemen.
3: Bigger cities have more players than rural areas. JUST St. X alone has what?...1164 boys from 9-11 enrolled? That's 1 single school from Cincy. The entire NWC combined has 1180 boys. Now imagine a school like St. X with a line of tradition and success in their program with that amount of QUALITY athletes to work with.
4: Bigger city programs do have better players. Some of it is socioeconomic, player transfers, and quite frankly better genetics when you do the research.
Is that to say, there are no quality players in rural areas like NW Ohio?...not at all, but who really from the NW Ohio has exactly exploded into the NFL for example? The only one I can think off the top of my head is Kory Lichtensteiger from Crestview who was/is starting for the Redskins. On the other hand, how many from Cincy, Cleveland, Columbus are?...quite a few more. Several small school players get overlooked and go on to DIII, DII, and D1AA schools and dominate...they more than likely(in some, not all) could have played well enought to play D1 football if even at the MAC level, but it is what it is.
Edited by jeffcat-bucki, 11 September 2012 - 11:09 PM.
#5
Posted 11 September 2012 - 01:48 PM
#6
Posted 11 September 2012 - 02:22 PM
Elliot Mealer- Wauseon- Michigan
Colt Pettit- PH- Many D1 offers
There are more, these are just off the top of my head.
#7
Posted 11 September 2012 - 04:01 PM
Michael Dennis, Carey, Michigan State
#8
Posted 11 September 2012 - 04:10 PM
longshot89, on 11 September 2012 - 11:25 AM, said:
Some D-4 TO D-6 guys that come to mind in the past 5 years that are now playing D-1
Zac Dysert (Ada) Miami (OH), probably going to the NFL
Briggs Orsbon (Crestview) - Ball State, I believe led them in receiving more than once including when they were 12-2 in 2008
Jordan Thompson (Parkway) - Ohio, starting TE
The Homan Brothers (Coldwater) - Ross had an outstanding career, little brother is still at Ohio State
Ty O'Conner (LCC) - Michigan St.
Maty Mauk (Kenton) - Missouri
I think that bigger schools get more attention because there is more selection. But, I think the small schools (especially around us) put more emphasis on sports because that is all we have. I don't think the size of school has anything to do with it, I think it is the quality of the program.
There just are not many D1 and D2 football scholarships available. Athletic scholarships are probably one of the biggest myths out there that many people just don't understand. D3 and NAIA don't have athletic scholarships. D2 is very limited and D1 is for the elite athletes. Even the very, very good players that are named earlier in this thread are playing very little for their respective programs. And this is from a pool of hundreds and hundres of seniors who've graduated from high school in NW Ohio over the past 5-6 years.
#9
Posted 11 September 2012 - 04:28 PM
#10
Posted 11 September 2012 - 06:48 PM
I will concede that if a kid does not make any effort to be recruited (such as going to camps, sending highlights to coaches, filling out questionnaires, etc.) playing for a bigger school may help him get noticed as recruiters may attend games for other athletes. However, an athlete can also be more easily overlooked in these situations.
10 or even 5 years ago it may have been different. But now, every school has camps specifically for recruiting and has coaches whose job is to recruit certain areas. Also, it seems like every kid has a highlight film these days. Much like going from college to the NFL, being recruited for college is based more on ability than stats and that information is obtained in camps.
Edited by Rd2Glory, 11 September 2012 - 06:48 PM.
#11
Posted 11 September 2012 - 06:57 PM
If a kid is good enough he should be camping. If you have the right size, speed, mechanics, and so on they will take notice. Unfortunately there are a lot of coaches from smaller schools who offer little help in recruitment efforts. They should offer help getting highlight videos made, helping advise which camps to attend, and updating stats on major sports sites for all of their players - which is rare for a lot of coaches.
#13
Posted 11 September 2012 - 08:21 PM
#14
Posted 11 September 2012 - 08:32 PM
#16
Posted 11 September 2012 - 09:44 PM
LJ
#17
Posted 11 September 2012 - 10:47 PM
cubbies4life, on 11 September 2012 - 09:01 PM, said:
I missed the football part.
I saw Craft in person, and he would not be a better QB. He would have had an excellent career at a MAC school though.
#18
Posted 12 September 2012 - 08:27 AM
#19
Posted 12 September 2012 - 09:01 AM
#20
Posted 12 September 2012 - 09:48 AM
blldog, on 12 September 2012 - 09:01 AM, said:
Also an excellent point.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users