Clyde 24-0 over Toledo Waite
#1
Posted 24 September 2015 - 08:02 AM
#2
Posted 24 September 2015 - 11:24 AM
Other local lopsided scores in recent past are (off the top of my head & then checked OSSCA for score confirmation):
Allen East 18-0 Convoy Crestview (2015)
Cory-Rawson 21-0 Convoy Crestview (2015: with a note saying CR played the second half 9 v 11).
Lima Bath 20-0 Van Wert (2014)
Also, I'm NOT saying these were necessary, but scores like this aren't that far off or uncommon in the major cities where good teams play horrible teams, due to proximity. Most of the time, a team will play its JV members & still put up high scores. I really only have an issue if teams leave starters in for most of the game to get stats, however, if a 3rd-string player scores 2-3 goals against a bad team, so be it. However, I have no idea which players scored for the teams above.
It's been briefly discussed on the boys thread before with Mifflin (Columbus) in 2013 http://rocketcorner....showtopic=22317 , http://rocketcorner....showtopic=22314
Edited by Hagen, 24 September 2015 - 11:53 AM.
#3
Posted 24 September 2015 - 11:52 AM
Hagen, on 24 September 2015 - 11:24 AM, said:
In the 2014 girls soccer state tournament (which is based primarily on location), there were 32 games between the three divisions where the score difference was 10+ goals. Div 2 & 3 each had 13 instances.
The largest score differentials were:
Div. 2 — (2-seed) Eastwood 24-0 Tol. Rodgers (10-seed).
Div. 1 — (2-seed) Bishop Hartley 20-0 River Valley (18-seed).
Other 30 matches were between 10-15 differences.
#4
Posted 24 September 2015 - 09:14 PM
Henry Ford
#6
Posted 25 September 2015 - 08:10 AM
Maltese Falcon, on 24 September 2015 - 09:18 PM, said:
Not sugar-coating it, Waite is bad & has been, however, I don't think they should drop soccer entirely. If they still have players wanting to field a team, let them participate. Could they play a JV schedule to "build" the program or play competitively? Absolutely. I'm not sure if they have a conference-bylaw or anything that prevents that, but it would help.
#8
Posted 26 September 2015 - 08:02 PM
Maltese Falcon, on 24 September 2015 - 09:18 PM, said:
#9
Posted 26 September 2015 - 08:06 PM
Hagen, on 25 September 2015 - 08:10 AM, said:
#10
Posted 28 September 2015 - 09:18 AM
General Tso, on 26 September 2015 - 08:01 PM, said:
General Tso, on 26 September 2015 - 08:02 PM, said:
General Tso, on 26 September 2015 - 08:06 PM, said:
1. Never wish injury on any KID.
2. You're right. Programs can never improve & those kids don't deserve the opportunity to play structured soccer.
3. Excluding football and some basketball, no sports cover costs.
Edited by Hagen, 28 September 2015 - 09:19 AM.
#11
Posted 11 October 2015 - 06:58 PM
TiGgEr3, on 24 September 2015 - 09:14 PM, said:
Tig, routinely? Their first two tournament games v Tiffin Calvert and Ada were 16-0 and 18-0 which yeah were shameful esp if starters were left in past half....other than that 10-0 which is commonly accepted was their top on the season. I guess I need to look up routinely.
Scores can be found at ossca.org.
#12
Posted 23 October 2015 - 06:57 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users