Should the BVC expand?
#1
Posted 10 February 2012 - 02:39 PM
What does everyone think? Initial talk was shot down in a vote this week. Should they reconsider?
#2
Posted 10 February 2012 - 05:18 PM
#3
Posted 10 February 2012 - 05:30 PM
#4
Posted 10 February 2012 - 05:32 PM
Edited by osufan512, 10 February 2012 - 05:33 PM.
#5
Posted 11 February 2012 - 09:11 AM
#6
Posted 11 February 2012 - 02:58 PM
Hinkle, on 11 February 2012 - 09:11 AM, said:
#7
Posted 11 February 2012 - 03:45 PM
polkhigh33, on 10 February 2012 - 02:39 PM, said:
Polk - Not sure who your sources are? There was preliminary talk a couple weeks back, but no vote was taken. This whole issue on expansion will have more discussion yet this month. The idea has not been shot down at this time. There was a well thought out plan presented to members with pros and cons laid out as well. Not sure what the final verdict will be. Just hope all the schools give the proper attention before they make a hasty decision.
#8
Posted 12 February 2012 - 10:58 AM
Edited by Muahahaha, 12 February 2012 - 03:43 PM.
I had the last laugh. Muahahaha
#10
Posted 12 February 2012 - 04:57 PM
I Know a Guy, on 12 February 2012 - 04:45 PM, said:
I think there are 8-10 teams that would make a nice addition to the league. It may take the 8 or 10 invitees just get 4 schools to accept. Certainly the schools to the East are looking for options, but several teams to the West makes also sense.
#11
Posted 13 February 2012 - 10:32 PM
#12
Posted 13 February 2012 - 11:09 PM
All 4 of these schools are around the size of Van Buren, helping to span the size disparity between L-B and the rest of the BVC. Personally, I don't consider L-B huge, like most of the BVC does. But having more like-sized schools in the mix would mean that they wouldn't be all by themselves with the "big" enrollment. It would make it a little easier to go big/small for divisions...BUT, I prefer a geographic split (east/west or north/south) to keep travel down and to keep natural rivalries intact. Besides, if enrollments change, the conference would have to rearrange the divisions in a big/small set-up...not so with a geographic split.
#13
Posted 14 February 2012 - 12:31 AM
#14
Posted 14 February 2012 - 09:26 AM
#15
Posted 14 February 2012 - 09:39 AM
rstefosu07, on 14 February 2012 - 09:26 AM, said:
Beginning next year I believe, OHSAA is allowing a girls and boys to expand their basketball schedules to 22 games.
#16
Posted 14 February 2012 - 09:58 AM
#17
Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:03 PM
For softball and baseball... Guess some BVC AD's would have to start scheduling full seasons (27 games) instead of 60% of a season. Cory-Rawson comes to mind...
#18
Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:16 PM
#19
Posted 14 February 2012 - 09:42 PM
On a side note, it would be hard to keep track of two threads, but I was wondering, since it is basketball season would this thread get more debate in the basketball forum?
#20
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:19 AM
FightingFifth, on 14 February 2012 - 09:42 PM, said:
I don't see why that would be true. Teams can schedule 22 games next season. At most, Leipsic would play 13 BVC games and 7 PCL games. That still leaves 2 non-conf games. And the BVC might have a schedule that consists of only 10 or 11 league games. Or they could play P-G once and count in both leagues. To me, I think it might make scheduling easier as the AD only has to find 2 n-c games. All the rest is already set.
Edited by Warthog, 15 February 2012 - 09:19 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users