D3 Region 10 Championship #1 (12-0) Wapak vs #3 (11-1) Trotwood
#1
Posted 16 November 2014 - 09:12 AM
Trotwood Madison is the next in line. TM has had recent success having won a state title and making other trips to the state finals.That was then and this is now. Trotwood has a new head coach with Douglas moving on to Springfield after last year.
TM is athletic and talented but they are beatable. They have come out flat with a lack of focus in several of their games . They have been held scoreless early in a few games. Their QB is a recruit for TTUN and is a dual threat guy but has a completion percentage of less than 50% for the year. An interesting fact for a team that is seen as this strong offensively.
Wapak can make the state finals by continuing to play the way they have been. Play suffocating defense, continue to click on offense, eliminate the penalties and take care of the football.
Go 'Skins!!
#2
Posted 16 November 2014 - 09:26 AM
#3
Posted 16 November 2014 - 12:41 PM
#4
Posted 16 November 2014 - 12:45 PM
dartmaster63, on 16 November 2014 - 09:12 AM, said:
Trotwood Madison is the next in line. TM has had recent success having won a state title and making other trips to the state finals.That was then and this is now. Trotwood has a new head coach with Douglas moving on to Springfield after last year.
TM is athletic and talented but they are beatable. They have come out flat with a lack of focus in several of their games . They have been held scoreless early in a few games. Their QB is a recruit for TTUN and is a dual threat guy but has a completion percentage of less than 50% for the year. An interesting fact for a team that is seen as this strong offensively.
Wapak can make the state finals by continuing to play the way they have been. Play suffocating defense, continue to click on offense, eliminate the penalties and take care of the football.
Go 'Skins!!
#5
Posted 16 November 2014 - 12:48 PM
#6
Posted 16 November 2014 - 01:33 PM
Irish Viking 87, on 16 November 2014 - 12:45 PM, said:
Qualifying for the state finals is exactly what I meant. The final four.
The state championship game would be the next step.
#7
Posted 16 November 2014 - 01:37 PM
#8
Posted 16 November 2014 - 01:39 PM
Maltese Falcon, on 16 November 2014 - 12:48 PM, said:
What I beleive and try to talk myself into has no bearig on the outcome of the game
The game will be decided by the players and the coaches on Friday night on the field
But, maybe the Wapak crowd can "help" it seemed to help last Friday.
#9
Posted 16 November 2014 - 03:41 PM
Good luck to the Redskins!
'97, '98, '99, '05, '08, '10 Division VI State Champions
#10
Posted 17 November 2014 - 12:25 PM
#11
Posted 17 November 2014 - 08:32 PM
#12
Posted 17 November 2014 - 09:50 PM
4-6 (40.0%), 7th playoff appearance
Wapak finished 10-0 in 2014, with a final AP rank of #3, and won its first WBL title since 2006, and first perfect WBL record and 10-0 season since 1986. It added to a school record win total last week with its 12th of the season. For the first time ever, the Redskins are making a consecutive playoff appearance. It is also the first time they have won more than one playoff game in a season, and their first regional final appearance. The WBL’s playoff record is 96-64 (60.0%), which includes 2-5 against current Greater Western Ohio Conference teams, although 0-2 since the GWOC formed in 2001. Wapak has 3 of the 5 losses – 55-9 to Vandalia Butler in a 2000 regional quarterfinal game, 40-21 to Piqua in a 2006 regional semifinal game, and 27-6 to T-M in a 2011 regional semifinal game. WBL teams are 23-4 against 3 seeds in the playoffs, Wapak is 1-0 against 3 seeds. WBL teams are 3-3 against #7-ranked teams in the playoffs, Wapak has never faced one. The Redskins faced two playoff teams in the regular season and won both – 28-6 over 8-2 Bellefontaine and a 15-14 over 8-2 Kenton. Last week, Wapak handled Tippecanoe 28-7 after rolling over Oxford Talawanda 49-14 in the first round.
Wapak’s average playoff score is 23.9 offense and 28.2 defense.
Wapak’s average 2014 score is 30.4 offense and 6.7 defense.
Trotwood-Madison’s playoff resume:
24-8 (75.0%), 10th playoff appearance
2013 Division III State Runner Up
2012 Division II State Runner Up
2011 Division II State Champ
2010 Division II State Runner Up
1981 Division II State Runner Up
Trotwood-Madison finished 9-1 in the regular season, and 5-0 in the GWOC North Division, good enough for first place. It went 2-1 against other GWOC teams, the only loss being to Division I 10-0 Centerville, which was upset in the first round of the playoffs. The Rams finished 7th in the AP poll, the 4th straight year it has finished ranked, with 3 of those being top 10, is running a streak of 6 consecutive playoffs, and has reached the state title game 4 years in a row with 1 title. That’s a 21-4 playoff record in the last 6 years, I can’t imagine more than Marion Local and maybe Coldwater have a better percentage in the state during that time. The combined record of GWOC North teams is 57-37 (60.6%), with T-M & Piqua doing much of the damage. T-M’s record against the WBL in the playoffs is 1-0, with that 2011 win against Wapak. The Rams faced just one playoff team in the regular season, a 21-14 loss to Division I #2 Centerville, before having no trouble with Western Brown (55-13) and Bellbrook (41-6) in the last two weeks.
T-M’s average playoff score is 32.6 offense and 18.4 defense.
T-M’s average 2014 score is 39.6 offense and 13.9 defense.
#13
Posted 18 November 2014 - 09:23 AM
#14
Posted 18 November 2014 - 11:12 AM
Chilidog, on 18 November 2014 - 09:23 AM, said:
#15
Posted 18 November 2014 - 06:37 PM
#16
Posted 18 November 2014 - 07:02 PM
Teddy Malone, on 18 November 2014 - 06:37 PM, said:
#17
Posted 18 November 2014 - 07:08 PM
the_beezer, on 18 November 2014 - 07:02 PM, said:
#18
Posted 18 November 2014 - 07:15 PM
#19
Posted 18 November 2014 - 09:38 PM
#20
Posted 18 November 2014 - 11:00 PM
1. turnover battle MUST be won
2. run the ball effectively
3. prevent more than 3-4 big plays...speed kills
4. penalties to a minimum
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users