#1
Posted 13 January 2014 - 09:53 PM
What gives?
#2
Posted 13 January 2014 - 10:15 PM
A reason could be all the radio stations are picking up more and more games each year
#3
Posted 13 January 2014 - 10:29 PM
Colt45, on 13 January 2014 - 10:15 PM, said:
A reason could be all the radio stations are picking up more and more games each year
I will give you that, Dakota Mathias alone brings people to the field house for many games.
Back in 1997 OG and Elida played at the fieldhouse, a WBL title on the line..........OG was 15-1, not sure what Elida's record was, but the bulldogs were good........there were people sitting in the top row on both sides.
Another example is the 1999 Elida- Lima Sr. matchup at the field house. The place was absolutely packed before halftime of the JV game ( i know, I was there). You will not see this again.
#4
Posted 13 January 2014 - 10:29 PM
#5
Posted 13 January 2014 - 10:31 PM
#6
Posted 13 January 2014 - 10:36 PM
FlightCrew, on 13 January 2014 - 10:29 PM, said:
The price of a ticket to a HS basketball game has not changed in the past 10 years, $5-6.00. Concessions are still dirt cheap, .50 cent popcorn, $1 pops......this is way less than you would pay for concessions anywhere else, BUT, I know HS basketball fans and they are not there for the concessions, they are there for the basketball and the level of play has fallen..........but is that it?
games during the week have always been low attendance, but the weekend games are still suffering.
#7
Posted 13 January 2014 - 10:45 PM
Maltese Falcon, on 13 January 2014 - 10:29 PM, said:
I will give you that, Dakota Mathias alone brings people to the field house for many games.
Back in 1997 OG and Elida played at the fieldhouse, a WBL title on the line..........OG was 15-1, not sure what Elida's record was, but the bulldogs were good........there were people sitting in the top row on both sides.
Another example is the 1999 Elida- Lima Sr. matchup at the field house. The place was absolutely packed before halftime of the JV game ( i know, I was there). You will not see this again.
#8
Posted 13 January 2014 - 10:50 PM
#9
Posted 13 January 2014 - 10:54 PM
FlightCrew, on 13 January 2014 - 10:50 PM, said:
That explains why the average age of many fans at most HS basketball games is around 50-70 years old. These folks are the ones who packed gyms 20-30 years ago, but many have died off or just can't get to games anymore....and there is no one to replace them.
#10
Posted 13 January 2014 - 11:24 PM
#11
Posted 14 January 2014 - 02:52 AM
Edited by BlueBuckIjays, 14 January 2014 - 02:59 AM.
#12
Posted 14 January 2014 - 02:30 PM
#13
Posted 14 January 2014 - 02:58 PM
Those kids who have never been afforded the opportunity to go to these games as children...are now parents who don't have any tradition of supporting the local teams...because it was never stressed to them as children. Movies, television, drinking, etc are more important than a high school sports event.
In many communities the star athlete and/or coach are actually derided. We see that on here all the time. For example...I'm laughing at the current "fire Kill" discussion where Best is now held up as the gold standard of the superior coach. I've been around here long enough to remember the threads where Best was considered outdated. Heck I remember them saying the same thing about Seg. Somewhere in the past 25 years it has become acceptable to criticise and deride SUCCESS. Good people, coaches, and players who care and work hard at their craft are criticised for being successful. There have always been "haters." But these days, in many communities the "haters" are the popular bunch. It is COOL to not attend games. It is COOL to drink and party, etc. Those kids who bother to show up and support their school are not typically from the "in" crowd.
The reason that the people attending games are older is that they are remnants of a different generation where success, loyalty, spirit, etc were concepts to be celebrated. The star player/coach were RESPECTED for their work and abilities. These concepts are no longer deemed worthy of respect among the masses.
I could give a political theory as to why this as happened...but I don't have the time or desire. Suffice to say...it is what it is. Those who actually stress and admire the pursuit of excellence, teamwork, etc are the minority. We show up to the games. We usually have very good seats! We also tend to be the dominant personalities on the RC...though I believe almost all of us know we are a dying breed.
Edited by Dman, 14 January 2014 - 03:03 PM.
Michael Jordan
#14
Posted 14 January 2014 - 03:08 PM
Dman, on 14 January 2014 - 02:58 PM, said:
Those kids who have never been afforded the opportunity to go to these games as children...are now parents who don't have any tradition of supporting the local teams...because it was never stressed to them as children. Movies, television, drinking, etc are more important than a high school sports event.
In many communities the star athlete and/or coach are actually derided. We see that on here all the time. For example...I'm laughing at the current "fire Kill" discussion where Best is now held up as the gold standard of the superior coach. I've been around here long enough to remember the threads where Best was considered outdated. Heck I remember them saying the same thing about Seg. Somewhere in the past 25 years it has become acceptable to criticise and deride SUCCESS. Good people, coaches, and players who care and work hard at their craft are criticised for being successful. There have always been "haters." But these days, in many communities the "haters" are the popular bunch. It is COOL to not attend games. It is COOL to drink and party, etc. Those kids who bother to show up and support their school are not typically from the "in" crowd.
The reason that the people attending games are older is that they are remnants of a different generation where success, loyalty, spirit, etc were concepts to be celebrated. The star player/coach were RESPECTED for their work and abilities. These concepts are no longer deemed worthy of respect among the masses.
I could give a political theory as to why this as happened...but I don't have the time or desire. Suffice to say...it is what it is. Those who actually stress and admire the pursuit of excellence, teamwork, etc are the minority. We show up to the games. We usually have very good seats! We also tend to be the dominant personalities on the RC...though I believe almost all of us know we are a dying breed.
+1
Some good (and kinda sad) responses overall.
#15
Posted 14 January 2014 - 03:22 PM
Dman, on 14 January 2014 - 02:58 PM, said:
Those kids who have never been afforded the opportunity to go to these games as children...are now parents who don't have any tradition of supporting the local teams...because it was never stressed to them as children. Movies, television, drinking, etc are more important than a high school sports event.
In many communities the star athlete and/or coach are actually derided. We see that on here all the time. For example...I'm laughing at the current "fire Kill" discussion where Best is now held up as the gold standard of the superior coach. I've been around here long enough to remember the threads where Best was considered outdated. Heck I remember them saying the same thing about Seg. Somewhere in the past 25 years it has become acceptable to criticise and deride SUCCESS. Good people, coaches, and players who care and work hard at their craft are criticised for being successful. There have always been "haters." But these days, in many communities the "haters" are the popular bunch. It is COOL to not attend games. It is COOL to drink and party, etc. Those kids who bother to show up and support their school are not typically from the "in" crowd.
The reason that the people attending games are older is that they are remnants of a different generation where success, loyalty, spirit, etc were concepts to be celebrated. The star player/coach were RESPECTED for their work and abilities. These concepts are no longer deemed worthy of respect among the masses.
I could give a political theory as to why this as happened...but I don't have the time or desire. Suffice to say...it is what it is. Those who actually stress and admire the pursuit of excellence, teamwork, etc are the minority. We show up to the games. We usually have very good seats! We also tend to be the dominant personalities on the RC...though I believe almost all of us know we are a dying breed.
#16
Posted 14 January 2014 - 03:24 PM
#17
Posted 14 January 2014 - 04:42 PM
#18
Posted 14 January 2014 - 07:53 PM
You are describing the "me" phenomenon. Parents care more about themselves than their children's success, etc. There are good young athletes in every community who never develop because mom and dad (when both are actually in the home) don't have the "time" to take their kid to practice. Who has not heard "they practice too much?" Or "let these kids have a life outside sports."
When I hear this stuff...I automatically assume we have a mother/father more invested in their home entertainment system than their kids. Most of the time I assume correct.
There was a time that society frowned on deadbeat parents. Now we make excuses for, or actually celebrate their apathy.
How many fathers you see shooting baskets with their kids? Smacking ground balls, etc...?
Those fathers that do are often derided by the majority deadbeats for "pushing their kid too hard."
Society is ass backwards in my opinion. When daddy would rather watch his hi def than throw a ball with his kid...OR take him to the field to watch a game... Daddy is a selfish prick.
More people in the general society will take issue with my preceding paragraph than daddy sitting on his ass.
That is the real reason the stands are empty...
Michael Jordan
#19
Posted 14 January 2014 - 10:41 PM
Dman, on 14 January 2014 - 07:53 PM, said:
When I hear this stuff...I automatically assume we have a mother/father more invested in their home entertainment system than their kids. Most of the time I assume correct.
My but you do have a gift for hyperbole, lol. How do you know that you assume 'correct' [sic]? Do you do some background checking on these 'deadbeats'?
#20
Posted 15 January 2014 - 12:00 AM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users