PCL 1st team 2nd team
#1
Posted 08 February 2013 - 07:02 PM
#2
Posted 08 February 2013 - 09:49 PM
Leipsic 2nd team
#3
Posted 09 February 2013 - 12:33 AM
#5
Posted 09 February 2013 - 06:58 AM
Kane, on 09 February 2013 - 12:33 AM, said:
#6
Posted 09 February 2013 - 07:06 AM
#7
Posted 09 February 2013 - 11:13 AM
#8
Posted 09 February 2013 - 11:22 AM
oldlefty, on 09 February 2013 - 07:06 AM, said:
#9
Posted 09 February 2013 - 06:28 PM
Edited by bigbrother6, 09 February 2013 - 06:29 PM.
#10
Posted 09 February 2013 - 11:57 PM
bigbrother6, on 09 February 2013 - 06:28 PM, said:
#11
Posted 11 February 2013 - 07:58 AM
von, on 09 February 2013 - 11:57 PM, said:
You said it, these awards are nothing more than just a "feel good" accomplishment. The 1st team PCL belongs to Ottoville. I don't see one girl from another team that should be on there over an Ottoville girl. Then the second team can be split with a couple girls from Leipsic, one from Kalida and P-G. That's about it.
#12
Posted 11 February 2013 - 08:11 AM
#13
Posted 11 February 2013 - 08:16 AM
#14
Posted 11 February 2013 - 08:34 AM
oldlefty, on 11 February 2013 - 08:16 AM, said:
Like someone said before
Ottoville: First Team
Leipsic: Second Team
P-G/Continental/Kalida: Honerable Mention
I mean come on, Ottoville has now won 4 straight PCL titles and never lost a single game in that league. It's just hilarious that coaches out there in that league feel there are better players than the starting 5 of Ottoville in that league.
Edited by Kane, 11 February 2013 - 08:38 AM.
#15
Posted 11 February 2013 - 09:24 AM
#16
Posted 11 February 2013 - 09:32 AM
oldlefty, on 11 February 2013 - 09:24 AM, said:
Well realistically I think he would especially losing Kaufman. There are some good players out there in the league but just not as good as their starting 5 hence why they have won 4 straight PCL titles without a loss.
#17
Posted 11 February 2013 - 10:03 AM
#18
Posted 11 February 2013 - 10:10 AM
oldlefty, on 11 February 2013 - 10:03 AM, said:
Ya that is pretty much right on. Couldn't agree more.
#19
Posted 11 February 2013 - 10:37 AM
#20
Posted 11 February 2013 - 10:45 AM
flounder, on 11 February 2013 - 10:37 AM, said:
Flounder why you ask a question that you already know the answer to buddy? lol
Anyways, It's irrelevant if you ask me. Too many people use that to justify a great coach. I think it's tough to measure coaches. There are different scenarios that come to mind. I don't think you have to win championships to be considered great, some could just use the argument well they (coaches) were just surrounded by a good team. Kleman has had some close calls at winning a couple but fell just short. If you ask me, I think he deserves to be in the discussion.
Edited by Mysterio, 11 February 2013 - 10:45 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users