Week 5 | |||||
DIVISION I | |||||
Rank | Team | 1st Place Votes | Record | Points | Movement |
1 | Huber Hts. Wayne | 11 | 20-0 | 200 | 0 |
2 | Lima Sr. | 9 | 18-0 | 196 | 0 |
3 | Gahanna Lincoln | 20-1 | 155 | 1 | |
4 | Wilmington | 19-1 | 131 | 1 | |
5 | Warren Harding | 1 | 17-1 | 100 | 2 |
6 | Garfield Hts. | 16-3 | 91 | 0 | |
7 | Cin. Elder | 18-3 | 66 | 3 | |
8 | Cin. Moeller | 17-3 | 58 | -5 | |
9 | Cols. Northland | 18-2 | 40 | -1 | |
10 | Westerville S. | 17-4 | 21 | -1 | |
11 | Mason | 18 | 1 | ||
12 | Cin. La Salle | 17 | 2 | ||
13 | Tol. St. John's | 13 | 1 | ||
DIVISION II | |||||
Rank | Team | 1st Place Votes | Record | Points | Movement |
1 | New Concord John Glenn | 16 | 19-1 | 201 | 0 |
2 | Chillicothe Unioto | 4 | 19-0 | 173 | 0 |
3 | Akr. SVSM | 15-3 | 143 | 0 | |
4 | Upper Sandusky | 1 | 19-0 | 119 | 2 |
5 | Trotwood-Madison | 17-2 | 116 | 0 | |
6 | Defiance | 16-3 | 107 | -2 | |
7 | Lexington | 18-2 | 81 | 1 | |
8 | Poland Seminary | 14-4 | 28 | 1 | |
9 | Napoleon | 13-4 | 19 | -2 | |
10 | Alliance | 19-1 | 17 | 1 | |
10 | Cle. Benedictine | 17-2 | 17 | 7 | |
10 | Cle. East Tech | 17-3 | 17 | 1 | |
13 | Johnstown-Monroe | 16 | -2 | ||
14 | McConnelsville Morgan | 15 | -3 | ||
14 | McArthur Vinton County | 15 | -4 | ||
DIVISION III | |||||
Rank | Team | 1st Place Votes | Record | Points | Movement |
1 | Lima Cent. Cath. | 15 | 18-1 | 199 | 0 |
2 | Massillon Tuslaw | 5 | 19-0 | 185 | 0 |
3 | Day. Northridge | 1 | 18-1 | 149 | 0 |
4 | Berlin Hiland | 18-2 | 132 | 0 | |
5 | Cin. Purcell Marian | 17-3 | 87 | 1 | |
5 | Worthington Christian | 17-3 | 87 | 0 | |
7 | Beachwood | 17-2 | 81 | 1 | |
8 | Milan Edison | 15-2 | 55 | 2 | |
9 | Cle. VASJ | 13-5 | 43 | -2 | |
10 | Proctorville Fairland | 14-4 | 29 | 1 | |
11 | Casstown Miami E. | 20 | -3 | ||
12 | Leavittsburg Labrae | 15 | 0 | ||
13 | Findlay Liberty-Benton | 13 | 1 | ||
DIVISION IV | |||||
Rank | Team | 1st Place Votes | Record | Points | Movement |
1 | Middle Point Lincolnview | 15 | 19-1 | 194 | 0 |
2 | Sandusky St. Mary | 5 | 17-1 | 183 | 1 |
3 | Mogadore | 16-1 | 123 | 2 | |
4 | Gorham Fayette | 18-1 | 121 | 2 | |
5 | Defiance Ayersville | 17-2 | 107 | -3 | |
6 | New Madison Tri-Village | 17-3 | 102 | 1 | |
7 | Glouster Trimble | 16-3 | 71 | 3 | |
8 | Jackson Center | 17-3 | 64 | -4 | |
9 | Russia | 17-3 | 33 | 2 | |
10 | Cols. Africentric | 15-6 | 31 | -2 | |
11 | Waterford | 28 | -2 | ||
12 | S. Charleston SE | 14 | 3 | ||
13 | Lisbon David Anderson | 1 | 13 | 4 | |
14 | Bristol | 13 | 0 | ||
15 | Cle. Hts. Lutheran E. | 12 | 1 | ||
15 | McDonald | 12 | -3 |
AP Poll Week 5
#1
Posted 08 February 2016 - 08:57 PM
#2
Posted 09 February 2016 - 02:51 PM
#5
Posted 10 February 2016 - 02:12 PM
moe_ szyslak, on 10 February 2016 - 10:46 AM, said:
Upper Sandusky's district? The one that has them probably playing Celina, OG, Shawnee/Defiance? If that's what you are referring to I'm not necessarily disagreeing b/c I haven't seen Upper Sandusky or Defiance play, but I have seen Celina, OG and Shawnee. And just for *******s and giggles here's some metrics for ya (take it for what it is).
According to www.maxpreps.com here are each teams Strength of Schedule Ratings:
Upper Sandusky: -6 (that's a minus six)
Celina: 4.8
OG: 5.1
Shawnee: 8.1
Defiance: 1.6
You can argue all you want that the website is not entirely accurate (i.e. missing game scores, duplicated scores, etc...). What you cannot argue (which has been generally pointed out) is the fact that each of Upper Sandusky's potential opponents have a SOS that is undoubtedly better.
Edited by StudentOfTheGame, 10 February 2016 - 02:12 PM.
#6
Posted 10 February 2016 - 04:51 PM
StudentOfTheGame, on 10 February 2016 - 02:12 PM, said:
According to www.maxpreps.com here are each teams Strength of Schedule Ratings:
Upper Sandusky: -6 (that's a minus six)
Celina: 4.8
OG: 5.1
Shawnee: 8.1
Defiance: 1.6
You can argue all you want that the website is not entirely accurate (i.e. missing game scores, duplicated scores, etc...). What you cannot argue (which has been generally pointed out) is the fact that each of Upper Sandusky's potential opponents have a SOS that is undoubtedly better.
#8
Posted 11 February 2016 - 08:54 AM
Dakota Green, on 10 February 2016 - 04:51 PM, said:
StudentOfTheGame, on 10 February 2016 - 02:12 PM, said:
According to www.maxpreps.com here are each teams Strength of Schedule Ratings:
Upper Sandusky: -6 (that's a minus six)
Celina: 4.8
OG: 5.1
Shawnee: 8.1
Defiance: 1.6
You can argue all you want that the website is not entirely accurate (i.e. missing game scores, duplicated scores, etc...). What you cannot argue (which has been generally pointed out) is the fact that each of Upper Sandusky's potential opponents have a SOS that is undoubtedly better.
Are you kidding me???
First off Upper plays all D3 & D4 schools if i am correct???
The WBL might be down this year but is still tuff.
If and this is a big if Upper gets by either Wapak or Celina which i am not completely sold they will
They will NOT and i repeat NOT beat OG
They will get whooped!!!
OG will win that game.
It is going to be OG & Defiance!!!
#9
Posted 11 February 2016 - 08:57 AM
Upper Sandusky is 105 in state of Ohio & 2906 Nationally
OG is 88 in state of Ohio and 2370 Nationally
#10
Posted 11 February 2016 - 12:29 PM
StudentOfTheGame, on 10 February 2016 - 02:12 PM, said:
According to www.maxpreps.com here are each teams Strength of Schedule Ratings:
Upper Sandusky: -6 (that's a minus six)
Celina: 4.8
OG: 5.1
Shawnee: 8.1
Defiance: 1.6
You can argue all you want that the website is not entirely accurate (i.e. missing game scores, duplicated scores, etc...). What you cannot argue (which has been generally pointed out) is the fact that each of Upper Sandusky's potential opponents have a SOS that is undoubtedly better.
I don't know about their SOS, or rankings.....but I wouldn't put it past Wapak to beat both Celina and Upper Sandusky and make a trip to districts.
#11
Posted 11 February 2016 - 12:37 PM
mysteryman2014, on 11 February 2016 - 08:54 AM, said:
First off Upper plays all D3 & D4 schools if i am correct???
The WBL might be down this year but is still tuff.
If and this is a big if Upper gets by either Wapak or Celina which i am not completely sold they will
They will NOT and i repeat NOT beat OG
They will get whooped!!!
OG will win that game.
It is going to be OG & Defiance!!!
I think you need to re-read my post. We are in agreement bud.
#13
Posted 13 February 2016 - 03:26 AM
Dakota Green, on 10 February 2016 - 04:51 PM, said:
Appreciate the respect but I heard that same thing back when Defiance played Port Clinton and Perkins in the tournament. Both played in leagues with smaller schools and the home and home league schedule, and Defiance lost to both. All it takes is that one given night...
#14
Posted 13 February 2016 - 10:39 AM
Teddy Malone, on 13 February 2016 - 03:26 AM, said:
#15
Posted 14 February 2016 - 09:00 PM
Dakota Green, on 13 February 2016 - 10:39 AM, said:
Teddy I agree with the respect , however if the Dawgs play the Rams at ONU the Dawgs would have such a extreme advantage over the Rams for the main reason being is that the Rams start 3 juniors and 2 sophomores. I will agree that they are very talented however I question their round robin schedule of all D-3-4 teams and their youth. They have only had two games where the games were close, so they just have not been tested during the season with any kind of adversity at all. Coaching wise, personnel wise, and tournament tested wise the Dawgs are far superior and if this matchup would to come to fruition the Dawgs would dominate and completely rout the Rams.
Upper does start 3 juniors, but there is a senior in the starting lineup, not two sophomores.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users