What's next for Lima Senior basketball?
#1
Posted 01 March 2013 - 03:49 PM
#2
Posted 01 March 2013 - 05:40 PM
#3
Posted 01 March 2013 - 06:10 PM
Edited by kaizen, 01 March 2013 - 06:12 PM.
#4
Posted 01 March 2013 - 07:05 PM
#5
Posted 01 March 2013 - 07:06 PM
#6
Posted 01 March 2013 - 09:25 PM
They lose because they don't know what to do out there. They play with one plan and if it does not work, they are done. They played Perrysburg pretty even the other night. Perrysburg switched up their defense. Ball game. Take every kid from LCC, Perry, Shawnee or any other school who has Lima Senior flavor and put them back in red and grey and they STILL will not win.
Can you see where I am going with this?
#7
Posted 02 March 2013 - 06:46 PM
#8
Posted 05 March 2013 - 07:01 PM
#11
Posted 07 March 2013 - 07:47 PM
fortfan, on 07 March 2013 - 01:34 PM, said:
So if he's implying it's the coaching I would be interested in knowing who would be better for the position. What is your explanation as to why it is that 90% of the time the blame is on the coach?
flounder, on 07 March 2013 - 02:32 PM, said:
lol - good one!
...or perhaps I disagree and believe the players lack passion
My apologies that I like to get clarification? Why so vague if you are going to point fingers? Why not just be forward w/ your opinion? Much easier to debate w/ that approach.
I wake up everyday eager to learn, as I would rather learn daily, then think I know it all. See where I am going with that?
#12
Posted 07 March 2013 - 08:10 PM
What I was trying to point out is that one or two kids does not make a team terrific. The other three along with the five to seven on the bench makes a team terrific.
#13
Posted 07 March 2013 - 10:49 PM
Yes it is coaching that I was alluding to, apparently too cryptically. I don't have a person in mind for the job but whoever it is I hope teaching fundamentals is part of his routine. Things like blocking out, setting screens, cuts to the basket, running actual plays that involve more than one guy dribbling the the other four standng around. Defensively, have a plan for when speed and steals are not working. You can't be a fast break team if you can't rebound, you can't rebound if you don't understand blocking out and position.
When you never see improvment in fundamentals over the course of the year and the story is the same year after year, then you have to ask "why not"? The answer to that question is sitting on the bench.
#14
Posted 07 March 2013 - 11:55 PM
I'll quote you since you provided specific examples:
"Things like blocking out, setting screens, cuts to the basket..."
These should be taught and learned at the 3rd thru 8th grade levels. One can argue the varsity coach should be involved with this level in order to have sustained success. I don't necessarily disagree with that, but I think that it's a players responsibility to learn the game on their own or from the outside.
That's all...sorry striking a nerve and wanting clarification.
#15
Posted 08 March 2013 - 06:26 AM
#16
Posted 08 March 2013 - 10:27 AM
You are correct, however, that fundmental skills are developed early on but it is not like riding a bicycle. You can learn them but if you don't practice them over and over they get lost. Why do college programs employ 12 assistant coaches? Even kids at this level need to be reminded and drilled over and over until it becomes just a part of what they do. If you see a team that lack those skills in game one and still lacks them in game eighteen, that is a coaching issue.
#17
Posted 08 March 2013 - 10:29 AM
#18
Posted 10 March 2013 - 10:03 AM
#19
Posted 10 March 2013 - 11:05 AM
#20
Posted 10 March 2013 - 04:14 PM
whodey, on 10 March 2013 - 10:03 AM, said:
How dare you say such slanderous garbage. If flounder wasn't watching, I would give you a piece of my mind Those boys made decisions based solely on academics. I'm SURE the tuition they pay is well worth it.
LJ
Edited by LimaJock, 10 March 2013 - 04:16 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users