[quote name='Will Play for Pay and/or Glory&#' date='Nov 13 2007, 02:24 AM' post='112042']
[i][b]
To set the record straight for you newbies..I'm against any and all transfers for athletic purposes. I've pissed off more public school fans than privates.
COME ON WILL PLAY GET AFTER THOSE OTTOVILLE ABUSERS! Oh wait that was for personal reasons, that makes it different. Nevermind.
You are very loyal and emotional in tearing down the likes of me, Grove-fan, and any others who dare question your integrity.
WHO WOULDN'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH SOMEONE QUESTIONING ONES INTEGRETITY WHEN THEY HAVE SKELETON'S IN THEIR OWN CLOSET, IE GROVE? SO MUCH HYPOCRACY AND SELF RIGHTIOUSNESS. Why is it that LCC is always tearing down but LCC haters are simply "discussing the moral/ethical ramifications of abusing physical/mental threat clauses in rules designed to assue fair competition." see my first sentence.
0
Why it is easy to root against LCC!!
Started by bulldogbert28, Oct 24 2007 11:17 AM
-
This topic is locked
127 replies to this topic
#122
-
- Members
- 121 posts
All District
Joined: 04-September 06
Member No.: 985
Posted 13 November 2007 - 10:48 AM
I think the Grove situation has been discussed on multiple threads. LCC-fan accuses (or calls them hillbilly's)...Grove fan responds in defense...you know the game. What has not been discussed is LCC's superintendent's alleged negligence/poor decision making...or reasonable inaction...depending on perspective. Nor has anybody been able to adequately explain why broke no rules is acceptable defense for LCC's ethical lapses, but not acceptable for Michael Jackson's! 
Reasonable debate topics...specifically for a thread titled "Why it is easy to root against LCC" are introduced...and we get name calling, calls for silence, or outright anger. All perfectly reasonable human emotional responses I might add...but rather weak on the intellectual level in terms of maintaining civil discussion. No doubt that this topic is a tough subject matter to discuss...
But if you would like...I could quote the OHSAA bylaw exceptions to show you how the isolated Grove incident and the pattern of LCC transfer acceptances are not exactly apples to oranges...that stuff is boring though. Suffice to say that drawing a moral equivalence to one isolated Grove incident (which I agree is shady) which utilizes a totally different OHSAA guideline than the typical LCC transaction is an intellectually weak position in my opinion. There is no need, at this time, to bring out the bylaws in attempt to educate. Emotion abounds...
It is much more entertaining to watch uncomfortable skirting of the issue (LCC's superintendent behavior) turn into anger and various censorship techniques. At the end of the day...we need some view counts on RC. They are trying to get to 3000! I figure if the volleyball forum can start getting some action...that is a good thing! I much prefer the drama and emotion, interspersed with some real eye-opening commentary...found on a thread like this...as compared to the typical "my team rules" thread. But everybody has differing tolerance levels!
...on the Ottoville issue...where should I be looking? I honestly don't know a thing about this. Has Ottoville's superintendent also sunk to a level in which he/she has had to abuse/ignore a clause that is meant to protect the mental and physical safety of minors? If this is indeed the case...I promise you that I'm firmly against any action/activity in which the authority figures are implicit or complicit in endorsing actions that lead to skirting the intentions of the rules.
Anyhow...lead me to the Big Green debate. We will see if anybody over there is capable of setting aside their blinding loyalties to actually discuss real issues...or if they too go into personal insults and various censorship techniques (my favorite)!
Reasonable debate topics...specifically for a thread titled "Why it is easy to root against LCC" are introduced...and we get name calling, calls for silence, or outright anger. All perfectly reasonable human emotional responses I might add...but rather weak on the intellectual level in terms of maintaining civil discussion. No doubt that this topic is a tough subject matter to discuss...
But if you would like...I could quote the OHSAA bylaw exceptions to show you how the isolated Grove incident and the pattern of LCC transfer acceptances are not exactly apples to oranges...that stuff is boring though. Suffice to say that drawing a moral equivalence to one isolated Grove incident (which I agree is shady) which utilizes a totally different OHSAA guideline than the typical LCC transaction is an intellectually weak position in my opinion. There is no need, at this time, to bring out the bylaws in attempt to educate. Emotion abounds...
It is much more entertaining to watch uncomfortable skirting of the issue (LCC's superintendent behavior) turn into anger and various censorship techniques. At the end of the day...we need some view counts on RC. They are trying to get to 3000!
I figure if the volleyball forum can start getting some action...that is a good thing! I much prefer the drama and emotion, interspersed with some real eye-opening commentary...found on a thread like this...as compared to the typical "my team rules" thread. But everybody has differing tolerance levels!...on the Ottoville issue...where should I be looking? I honestly don't know a thing about this. Has Ottoville's superintendent also sunk to a level in which he/she has had to abuse/ignore a clause that is meant to protect the mental and physical safety of minors? If this is indeed the case...I promise you that I'm firmly against any action/activity in which the authority figures are implicit or complicit in endorsing actions that lead to skirting the intentions of the rules.
Anyhow...lead me to the Big Green debate. We will see if anybody over there is capable of setting aside their blinding loyalties to actually discuss real issues...or if they too go into personal insults and various censorship techniques (my favorite)!
#123
-
- Members
- 221 posts
All District
Joined: 18-October 07
Member No.: 2874
Posted 13 November 2007 - 12:02 PM
I think its funny when LCC and Grove are compared when it comes to transfer's. We get one in five years, compared to LCC who gets God knows how many. Oh well, we must be wrong and the LCC supporters are right, as usual.
#124 Guest_Gumshoe_*
-
- Guests
Posted 13 November 2007 - 01:24 PM
QUOTE(OhioDog5 @ Nov 13 2007, 02:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think its funny when LCC and Grove are compared when it comes to transfer's. We get one in five years, compared to LCC who gets God knows how many. Oh well, we must be wrong and the LCC supporters are right, as usual.
Now Dog I know you are smarter than that. It is not a matter of how many but a matter of whether you accept them or not. Whether it is one or five does it matter. When Grove fan gets on here and accuses LCC of doing something they themselves do it is called Hypocracy. That means you say one thing and do another. Also when you don't call out these actions when they occur at other places, it shows that it is not the transfer thing that is your real issue but another issue all together and the only thing I know of is our coach spurned you and your school and now it is your duty to do the things you do.
And you said you were done posting on this.
#125 Guest_Gumshoe_*
-
- Guests
Posted 13 November 2007 - 01:36 PM
Will Play you constantly expose yourself for what you are in your own words. First though you are wrong as it goes like this. Grove fan makes unfounded accusations, LCC responds, I call Grove fan Hillbilly, Grove fan responds and you know the game. No one from LCC has ever that I know of started with the posts and threads against any other school and it has always been only in response.
You constantly refer to a pattern conducted by the LCC super but refuse to recognize LCC has not broken any rules. The best you can do is "skirting the problem" or "fanagling". LCC has gotten three transfers in three years that have participated in sports. Grove has had at least one, now Ottoville has one and I am sure we could go on and on. Why is it that you are so fixated on LCC and their superintendant, when you know as well as anyone else the situation amongst all schools all over Ohio. Three kids and you vilify LCC yet say nothing when the same situation appears on the front page of the Lima News Sports section. You say you know nothing of this? I say that is because you are to fixated on LCC. Why is that really? Are you from Bluffton and like Grove Fan feel spurned because the Super left your school district and joined a rival? You make him sound like some villian who hasn't followed the rules and should be held to a standard that doesn't exist anywhere else. If you are the moral compass for the area in regard to these occurances then you should be asking these questions about Ottoville and any number of others. The problem is your fixation is LCC and you have yet to allow us to know why.
You constantly refer to a pattern conducted by the LCC super but refuse to recognize LCC has not broken any rules. The best you can do is "skirting the problem" or "fanagling". LCC has gotten three transfers in three years that have participated in sports. Grove has had at least one, now Ottoville has one and I am sure we could go on and on. Why is it that you are so fixated on LCC and their superintendant, when you know as well as anyone else the situation amongst all schools all over Ohio. Three kids and you vilify LCC yet say nothing when the same situation appears on the front page of the Lima News Sports section. You say you know nothing of this? I say that is because you are to fixated on LCC. Why is that really? Are you from Bluffton and like Grove Fan feel spurned because the Super left your school district and joined a rival? You make him sound like some villian who hasn't followed the rules and should be held to a standard that doesn't exist anywhere else. If you are the moral compass for the area in regard to these occurances then you should be asking these questions about Ottoville and any number of others. The problem is your fixation is LCC and you have yet to allow us to know why.
#126
-
- Members
- 221 posts
All District
Joined: 18-October 07
Member No.: 2874
Posted 13 November 2007 - 03:09 PM
haha one against who knows how many. so funny...
#127 Guest_Gumshoe_*
-
- Guests
Posted 13 November 2007 - 03:41 PM
QUOTE(OhioDog5 @ Nov 13 2007, 05:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
haha one against who knows how many. so funny...
This is like debating with a child. Dog it does not matter whether it be one or a million in one. Your school has allowed transfers in, my school has allowed transfers in, every school in this area has allowed transfers in, every school in Ohio has allowed transfers in, (not factual just speculating), the bottom line is, you are a hypocrite! The laugh is on you for these posts that make you look dumb. Now quit it, I have been trying to defend you lately.
#128
-
- [A] Administrator
- 13,147 posts
Stinkys Legend
- Location:down by the Riley, getting ready for the smallmouth!
Joined: 28-December 05
Member No.: 3
Posted 13 November 2007 - 10:00 PM
after 125+ replies, 7 long pages, over 3400+ views, and nearly an hour of reading............I hereby close this volleyball thread down.........feel free to start another if you really feel it necessary........zoooom
home to the "Flounder & Rocketman's" Girls HS rankings
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
