Jump to content



Cory Rawson coaching circus.


284 replies to this topic

#41 General Tso

    All State

  • Members
  • 575 posts

    Joined: 28-January 14
    Member No.: 9596

Posted 22 February 2015 - 08:56 PM

View PostHH75, on 22 February 2015 - 06:37 PM, said:

1) have coached many things at many levels. Been asked a number of times by multiple schools to help with Varsity. But my job will not allow me the time it takes to be fully committed to a varsity assistant job. And I didn't need to be a varsity assistant for 11 years at McComb to have that understanding.

2) I am more than involved with multiple things I don't need another one, besides I don't need the divorce that would come along with adding to my to do list.

3) My Probation won't allow it! :)

Have I done something to you in the past for you to call me out?
Nope. Maybe he did give up on the kids and maybe he did not. I wasn't there. If you believe 10% of what you here from fans and parents you'll be alright.


#42 roarintiger1

    All State

  • Members
  • 834 posts

    Joined: 29-March 06
    Member No.: 769

Posted 22 February 2015 - 11:04 PM

Coaches, teachers, & school administrators sometimes make promises that they can't keep during the hiring process. This has happened at C-R a number of times. It's a darn shame. The only ones it hurts are the dedicated students and athletes. Believe me, there have been lots of bridges burned. This isn't the first and won't be the last. This latest football coach certainly knew the numbers and knew what he was getting into.

Edited by roarintiger1, 22 February 2015 - 11:22 PM.


#43 Tinman

    All District

  • Members
  • 206 posts

    Joined: 14-January 13
    Member No.: 9400

Posted 23 February 2015 - 12:27 AM

View PostHH75, on 22 February 2015 - 07:21 PM, said:

Let's all try to remember that with the possible exception of McComb and Vanlue (to this point) all the BVC schools have had good and bad times and their own fair share of the "Coaching circus" over the years. The only difference is some of them did it before the information age that now exists. Some of this stuff could have been easily solved by some mandatory consolidation before the state spent all this money for schools. As I have stated in the past, at this point, there should only be three schools at the most in Hancock county.
1)Findlay City
2) Hancock north
3) Hancock south.
Or east and west I don't care ...

I digress....

I was just thinking this the other day, except I included Findlay and split the county into four schools. Findlay is too big to get into a close league, so...

#44 Whiterabbit

    All District

  • Members
  • 388 posts

    Joined: 29-April 10
    Member No.: 6146
  • Location:Down the rabbit hole.....

Posted 23 February 2015 - 07:11 AM

okay, back to reality. Any names of any applicants yet? Interviews?

#45 HH75

    All State

  • Members
  • 839 posts

    Joined: 30-October 06
    Member No.: 1295

Posted 23 February 2015 - 07:47 AM

View Postroarintiger1, on 22 February 2015 - 11:04 PM, said:

Coaches, teachers, & school administrators sometimes make promises that they can't keep during the hiring process. This has happened at C-R a number of times. It's a darn shame. The only ones it hurts are the dedicated students and athletes. Believe me, there have been lots of bridges burned. This isn't the first and won't be the last. This latest football coach certainly knew the numbers and knew what he was getting into.


All true.

#46 HH75

    All State

  • Members
  • 839 posts

    Joined: 30-October 06
    Member No.: 1295

Posted 23 February 2015 - 07:54 AM

View PostGeneral Tso, on 22 February 2015 - 08:56 PM, said:


Nope. Maybe he did give up on the kids and maybe he did not. I wasn't there. If you believe 10% of what you here from fans and parents you'll be alright.

Nobody ran him out not the parents, not the administration,not the kids, not the BoE. Everyone was on board and thinking we we were heading in the right direction. Water under the bridge. Time to move on.

applications are due by Feb 27 per the school web site.

#47 2166

    All League

  • Members
  • 30 posts

    Joined: 17-February 15
    Member No.: 9803

Posted 23 February 2015 - 09:14 AM

View PostHH75, on 23 February 2015 - 07:54 AM, said:

Nobody ran him out not the parents, not the administration,not the kids, not the BoE. Everyone was on board and thinking we we were heading in the right direction. Water under the bridge. Time to move on.

applications are due by Feb 27 per the school web site.

Well said!!
East Prussia

#48 Rocketman

    Stinkys Legend

  • [A] Administrator
  • 13,147 posts

    Joined: 28-December 05
    Member No.: 3
  • Location:down by the Riley, getting ready for the smallmouth!

Posted 23 February 2015 - 09:17 AM

View PostWhiterabbit, on 23 February 2015 - 07:11 AM, said:

okay, back to reality. Any names of any applicants yet? Interviews?

I have quite clearly expressed the one applicant
home to the "Flounder & Rocketman's" Girls HS rankings

#49 2166

    All League

  • Members
  • 30 posts

    Joined: 17-February 15
    Member No.: 9803

Posted 23 February 2015 - 09:19 AM

View PostGeneral Tso, on 22 February 2015 - 08:40 PM, said:

bob22 and 2166, read what lefty wrote. Ever hear of a union????? Some people just can't be educated!!!

Yes, I have heard of a Union, and yes I have heard of a contract too. there is a reason for a first year teacher being granted a one year contract. Maybe some people need educated on that.

BTW what have I done to you to be called out?
East Prussia

#50 Shotgun_Blues

    All League

  • Members
  • 87 posts

    Joined: 29-September 12
    Member No.: 9309

Posted 23 February 2015 - 11:33 AM

First of all I hate to see whats going on at CR still remember when they were the powerhouse of the league...

Second don't hate on teachers unions... Unions fight for the sanctity of the contract. Just dot your eyes and cross your t's and you can get rid of anyone. Especially teachers in their first 3 years. Most contracts have a clause that they can non-renew after the first year without even stating a reason...

Best wishes to CR and in the long run you don't want someone who doesn't want to be there anyway...
Not sure which is dumber... An idiot or one who argues with an idiot!

#51 General Tso

    All State

  • Members
  • 575 posts

    Joined: 28-January 14
    Member No.: 9596

Posted 23 February 2015 - 06:14 PM

View Post2166, on 23 February 2015 - 09:19 AM, said:



Yes, I have heard of a Union, and yes I have heard of a contract too. there is a reason for a first year teacher being granted a one year contract. Maybe some people need educated on that.

BTW what have I done to you to be called out?
Nothing but if after one year there better be a great reason to non-renew a teacher. If there's not a great reason the school better hold on because it's a coming and it's going to be ugly. Union dues have to go for something.

#52 LimaJock

    Hall of Fame

  • Members
  • 1,830 posts

    Joined: 30-December 06
    Member No.: 1673

Posted 24 February 2015 - 05:30 PM

View PostGeneral Tso, on 23 February 2015 - 06:14 PM, said:

Nothing but if after one year there better be a great reason to non-renew a teacher. If there's not a great reason the school better hold on because it's a coming and it's going to be ugly. Union dues have to go for something.

Has nothing to do with union dues. My understanding, is any school district legally can not rehire a first year teacher just because they don't want too. If the old coach didn't know this than he didn't research it and probably has no recourse. The Union can do NOTHING if non-renewed. LJ
"I'm not always right, but I'm never wrong"

#53 lefty

    All State

  • Members
  • 738 posts

    Joined: 20-April 06
    Member No.: 804

Posted 25 February 2015 - 05:57 PM

It is my understanding all teachers at C.R. are working without contracts. This does happen.

#54 Common Sense

    Hall of Fame

  • Members
  • 1,299 posts

    Joined: 04-March 10
    Member No.: 5859

Posted 27 February 2015 - 12:59 PM

On a thread like this, you can get rid of a teacher because they aren't a coach anymore, but let's step into the real world for a moment folks. If you have a teacher that is a good teacher and educates kids, a schools not going to get rid of them because the are or are not a good coach for a sports team. Plain and simple. You send the message out to your community that you care more about sports than education...good luck with that.

#55 LimaJock

    Hall of Fame

  • Members
  • 1,830 posts

    Joined: 30-December 06
    Member No.: 1673

Posted 27 February 2015 - 09:27 PM

View PostCommon Sense, on 27 February 2015 - 12:59 PM, said:

On a thread like this, you can get rid of a teacher because they aren't a coach anymore, but let's step into the real world for a moment folks. If you have a teacher that is a good teacher and educates kids, a schools not going to get rid of them because the are or are not a good coach for a sports team. Plain and simple. You send the message out to your community that you care more about sports than education...good luck with that.

Or, the community supports the move since they feel that the staff member is not really vested in their children. I dont know what the deal will be but something is terribly wrong if you wont do a supplemental but you still want the big pay. If he is a great teacher awesome. But there is no one who thinks he was hired because of his teaching skill. MAYBE FOOTBALL. LJ
"I'm not always right, but I'm never wrong"

#56 HH75

    All State

  • Members
  • 839 posts

    Joined: 30-October 06
    Member No.: 1295

Posted 27 February 2015 - 10:01 PM

View PostCommon Sense, on 27 February 2015 - 12:59 PM, said:

On a thread like this, you can get rid of a teacher because they aren't a coach anymore, but let's step into the real world for a moment folks. If you have a teacher that is a good teacher and educates kids, a schools not going to get rid of them because the are or are not a good coach for a sports team. Plain and simple. You send the message out to your community that you care more about sports than education...good luck with that.

Or when your trying to teach kids that commitment means something and a new coach comes in promising that he is here to stay and is in it for the long haul, then decides after 8 months he's done coaching but still wants to teach, should you not send the message to your kids that the Administration and BoE are here for you and defend them??

DEFEND THE KIDS. Show the kids that commitment means something and if they are expected to commit then so should the guy that you (administration and BoE) hired!

Answer me this... Tell me the #1 reason Nathan Westenbarger was hired in June? To coach or to teach ??


He should be non renewed period!

#57 Common Sense

    Hall of Fame

  • Members
  • 1,299 posts

    Joined: 04-March 10
    Member No.: 5859

Posted 02 March 2015 - 10:13 AM

I would hope to goodness for the students of CR that he was hired to teach?? Anything else makes a mockery of the school system.

#58 BGR_80

    All District

  • Members
  • 271 posts

    Joined: 17-January 08
    Member No.: 3195
  • Location:The Hive

Posted 02 March 2015 - 10:42 AM

"O" Boy, fun reading up to this point!! The last I knew coaching is teaching and teaching is coaching. Bottom line, in order to staff the coaching positions in your school with in-house staff. You must have open teaching positions in order to bring new coaches in. So, middle of the road or below teachers should go, just like in the business world. But, in most cases administrators generally pencil whip teacher reviews avoiding confrontation. Then the next thing you know you're staffed with below average teachers and a school building full of ex-head coaches. Generally successful teachers and coaches go hand in hand, they are in it for all the right reasons teaching and coaching. It is happening all around the state; that is why there are so many head coaches in boys and girls sports not on staff as teachers. I am all for keeping the good teachers onboard but please get rid of any dead weight.

#59 roarintiger1

    All State

  • Members
  • 834 posts

    Joined: 29-March 06
    Member No.: 769

Posted 02 March 2015 - 12:33 PM

Hey, not bad there BGR_80. If RC had a like button, I'd be hitting it . :hifive2:

#60 2166

    All League

  • Members
  • 30 posts

    Joined: 17-February 15
    Member No.: 9803

Posted 02 March 2015 - 12:39 PM

View PostBGR_80, on 02 March 2015 - 10:42 AM, said:

"O" Boy, fun reading up to this point!! The last I knew coaching is teaching and teaching is coaching. Bottom line, in order to staff the coaching positions in your school with in-house staff. You must have open teaching positions in order to bring new coaches in. So, middle of the road or below teachers should go, just like in the business world. But, in most cases administrators generally pencil whip teacher reviews avoiding confrontation. Then the next thing you know you're staffed with below average teachers and a school building full of ex-head coaches. Generally successful teachers and coaches go hand in hand, they are in it for all the right reasons teaching and coaching. It is happening all around the state; that is why there are so many head coaches in boys and girls sports not on staff as teachers. I am all for keeping the good teachers onboard but please get rid of any dead weight.

Excellent.... :hifive2: :thumbup1:
East Prussia







2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users