This thread is comical.
Could you imagine the uproar if a private school were on here talking about hiring a coach to get players to transfer in?
You guys do realize one of the main reasons Quincy took his kids out of LSH was because he wanted his kids in a better environment, right? He's not a dumb man, and as a result he understands that there actually is more to life than basketball. That's not to say sports aren't important and can't play a part, especially to someone like Quincy who obviously has a love for basketball, but his decision was based on far more than that.
And there in lies your problem, LSH. These kids and parents have options now, as they should when it comes to RAISING THEIR CHILD AND THEIR EDUCATION. To have to determine where your child is educated and what environments they are exposed to based on where you live is draconian, and has thankfully started to shift.
While people tend to have the biggest problem with LCC receiving voucher students (a small portion of that is based on tax payer dollars going elsewhere and that's understandable), they are the least of LSH's worries. There has been a mass exodus of kids from the Lima City school district to surrounding public schools with open enrollment where they can go for FREE (something even a voucher doesn't provide given LCC's annual tuition).
And while LCC gets hammered for recruiting middle school kids via vouchers (again, laughable) and Elida gets a pass for having 4 of their Top 9 players on their state team not attend Elida until freshman year or later, the reality is that they are bound to get some athletes within the group that comes into their school. If there was real recruiting by any school, the make-up of their teams wouldn't mirror that of their general enrollment, and that's not the case with any area school. LCC's voucher percentage on their basketball team, and other sports, almost matches exactly to that of their overall enrollment (which leaves little doubt that part of the uproar stems from the fact that the race percentages don't always match, which is sad). Same with that of the area public schools and open enrollment. The fact is that those schools offer what are perceived to be as better environments to raise their kids, especially if they're not taking coursework that only LSH can offer.
Look at the OGT test scores for the surrounding schools and you'll see the issue loud and clear. I'm not one who's big on standardized testing, but they tend to be good at pointing out the schools on either end of the testing, good or bad. LCC has the highest scores in the area (had to brag a little

), but there are several area schools that are excellent, and even the schools at the lower end post respectable numbers when you factor everything in. That's because they are communities who tend to do things like have more people attend high school graduation ceremonies than state basketball ceremonies, and other things that demonstrate real priorities.
But LSH, on the other end, is scary bad. That's not to blame the administration or teachers, as they are educated and trained as well as any of the teachers at other schools. The problem starts and ends at home and with the parents, period. That doesn't get discussed because it's not politically correct and the immediate reactions are, however unfounded, "you're racist" and "you're blaming ALL the parents," but it's the unfortunate truth.
And the worst part is, I'm not sure how you begin to fix it. I sure as hell know it isn't hiring a basketball coach, whether it's Quincy or Coach K.
Edited by chalk_it_up, 24 March 2014 - 10:01 AM.