redskin rowdy, on 16 February 2014 - 11:21 PM, said:
Wapak Football...past..present..FUTURE
#41
Posted 17 February 2014 - 12:09 AM
#44
Posted 17 February 2014 - 07:00 AM
KitnaSucks, on 16 February 2014 - 10:49 PM, said:
Didn't see anything saying Kenton got worse
I did post that I felt Wapak upgraded that doesn't necessarily mean that Wapak football will have a better record either
Could be better, could be worse, but it does mean that we will have a coach that wants to live and work in our community and to me thats an upgrade in itself
#45
Posted 17 February 2014 - 08:03 AM
#46
Posted 17 February 2014 - 08:07 AM
#47
Posted 17 February 2014 - 08:35 AM
#48
Posted 17 February 2014 - 09:04 AM
#49
Posted 17 February 2014 - 10:12 AM
#50
Posted 17 February 2014 - 10:36 AM
KitnaSucks, on 17 February 2014 - 10:12 AM, said:
I highly doubt every coach on Kenton's staff could step in and take over the offense without any drop-off. They will be breaking in a new QB and their go-to stud WR is leaving as well.
The toughest thing about running Kenton's offense is understanding what people are doing to stop you, knowing how to counter that, and finally how to communicate that to your players in real-time during the game.
#51
Posted 17 February 2014 - 10:46 AM
#52
Posted 17 February 2014 - 11:14 AM
#53
Posted 17 February 2014 - 12:27 PM
KitnaSucks, on 17 February 2014 - 10:46 AM, said:
If it's not that hard to run this offense, then why did Mauk have his son call the offense when older, more experienced guys that had already paid their dues were already on the staff?
Or maybe having a person with experience in reading defenses at the highest levels of college football was a big advantage, and losing that perspective and experience will be tough to replace?
Highly doubt an offensive line coach can step in and call that offense, and have the ability to make adjustments in-game and react to what the other team is doing.
There is a lot more to running an offense than randomly picking plays off of a sheet of paper.
#54
Posted 17 February 2014 - 12:48 PM
#55
Posted 17 February 2014 - 12:55 PM
#56
Posted 17 February 2014 - 01:42 PM
#57
Posted 17 February 2014 - 02:00 PM
Again I will say that coach Mauk will be missed but don't assume that the offense ran well only because a Mauk was calling the plays.
The players also have a lot to do with how a team performs. That is tge bigger question who is the next qb. Receivers grow on trees there. It takes a qb to make the offense go
#58
Posted 17 February 2014 - 02:20 PM
zip52, on 17 February 2014 - 08:35 AM, said:
#59
Posted 17 February 2014 - 02:31 PM
#60
Posted 17 February 2014 - 03:17 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users