
OHSAA to discuss public/private split
#1
Posted 05 December 2012 - 12:57 PM
#2
Posted 05 December 2012 - 11:55 PM
I'm sick of hearing about it.
#4
Posted 06 December 2012 - 08:33 AM
jeffcat-bucki, on 05 December 2012 - 11:55 PM, said:
I'm sick of hearing about it.
Do not worry about your team getting better or improving themselves. Just blame all your woes on the private schools and kick them out of the OHSAA. Be careful what you wish for jeffcat-bucki your team may not have any players left if those private school start openly recruiting if this passes.
#5
Posted 06 December 2012 - 10:03 AM
NW Ohio Football Fan, on 06 December 2012 - 08:33 AM, said:
So you are saying they have been 'privately' recruiting up to this point?
#6
Posted 06 December 2012 - 10:22 AM
#7
Posted 06 December 2012 - 11:22 AM
What you have to remember is that if they stay members of OHSAA, assuming the resolution passes, they still have to abide by the rules that applies to them now even if they have seperate tourneys.
If they leave OHSAA they have to get their own tourneys, insurance, referees, etc. It would be a big undertaking for the private schools.
#8
Posted 06 December 2012 - 12:49 PM
NW Ohio Football Fan, on 06 December 2012 - 08:33 AM, said:
I don't really care either way, but I'm sick of hearing about it, and it is obvious as was noted that over 50% of the private schools are winning while they only make up 13% of the OHSAA. I could see due to demographics, socioeconomic deals, and whatnot that something along the lines of 25% would be understandable, but when the super schools and powerhouse teams are winning it all annually(in sports outside football mind you), it's pretty ridiculous. The all girls school sports are just as bad, if not way worse.
Sure, you have examples of bad public schools like Glenville and Whitmer these days going out and getting transfers from everywhere, but they are doing it because they are competing against the privates AKA Whitmer/Moeller this year. If you separate the public/private, it will alleviate some of this BS and everybody will be happy. I really don't see what the privates even have against it. What exactly are you losing by playing a separate tournament?
#9
Posted 06 December 2012 - 12:52 PM
flounder, on 06 December 2012 - 10:22 AM, said:
It's been done in numerous other states and they are doing just fine.
#11
Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:15 PM
flounder, on 06 December 2012 - 12:58 PM, said:
New Jersey does it with some(maybe all) of their sports.
Florida is beginning to partition itself from the FHSAA and starting a new athletic assocation for privates. Those are two that I can think of right off the top of my head.
EDIT: Texas has their own too. I believe they have their own athletic association though and are separate from the Texas public school athletic system.
Edited by jeffcat-bucki, 06 December 2012 - 03:21 PM.
#12
Posted 06 December 2012 - 05:18 PM
jeffcat-bucki, on 06 December 2012 - 12:49 PM, said:
Well, it sounds pretty simple then. However, there are plenty of schools that prefer to play the best competition, whether it be public or private. I can't imagine winning a title without having to get by a St. John's or a Newark Catholic if they are the best in their division.
#13
Posted 06 December 2012 - 05:48 PM
paperboy, on 06 December 2012 - 05:18 PM, said:
Finally..........someone with some common sense and a attitude of a winner.......that would be you paperboy.....to be the best you have to beat the best......of course many wussies in our society today just cannot live with that!!!!!!
#14
Posted 06 December 2012 - 06:05 PM
Hound Dog, on 06 December 2012 - 11:22 AM, said:
What you have to remember is that if they stay members of OHSAA, assuming the resolution passes, they still have to abide by the rules that applies to them now even if they have seperate tourneys.
If they leave OHSAA they have to get their own tourneys, insurance, referees, etc. It would be a big undertaking for the private schools.
That really doesn't seem like that big an undertaking to me. Setting up tourneys isn't incredibly difficult, I don't really see insurance as an issue, and there would be just as many referees after they split as before they split. You wouldn't have to train them or anything, just make your qualifications be that they if they're OHSAA certified then they are allowed to ref the private school games.
jeffcat-bucki, on 06 December 2012 - 12:49 PM, said:
Sure, you have examples of bad public schools like Glenville and Whitmer these days going out and getting transfers from everywhere, but they are doing it because they are competing against the privates AKA Whitmer/Moeller this year. If you separate the public/private, it will alleviate some of this BS and everybody will be happy. I really don't see what the privates even have against it. What exactly are you losing by playing a separate tournament?
I don't really see everyone being happy in this case. The private school division would most likely make it legal to recruit/offer athletic scholarships/etc. Public school people might be happy at first, but when their teams get worse and they lose all of their athletes to recruiting private schools, I don't see the public school people being happy for long.
jeffcat-bucki, on 06 December 2012 - 12:52 PM, said:
I went to school with a guy who was the captain of his state championship hockey team in a Northeastern state (not sure which one, didn't really know him that well). I asked how good the hockey was there compared to in Ohio. He responded that he didn't know how good the hockey was in Ohio, but that he was "just in the public school division, so it wasn't the really good Northeast hockey, but still legit."
---------
Someone mentioned on here once that they could split the schools into two divisions: One for all the private schools and any public school who wished to be a part of that division, and one for all other public schools. I think this would be the best option. You'd likely see all of the Coldwaters, Marion Locals, Glenvilles, (insert traditionally strong public school) join the private school division, and all of the schools crying for separation in the other division.
Edited by Rd2Glory, 06 December 2012 - 06:09 PM.
#15
Posted 06 December 2012 - 06:48 PM
#16
Posted 06 December 2012 - 07:35 PM
Edited by fiver, 06 December 2012 - 07:35 PM.
#17
Posted 06 December 2012 - 07:47 PM
Edited by longshot89, 06 December 2012 - 07:47 PM.
#18
Posted 06 December 2012 - 08:11 PM
longshot89, on 06 December 2012 - 07:47 PM, said:
#19
Posted 06 December 2012 - 08:34 PM
Rd2Glory, on 06 December 2012 - 06:05 PM, said:
It would be if they were not a part of the OHSAA. Insurance is a big deal. The catastrophic insurance covers everything to do with a game. Officials, spectators if they get hurt at a game, players, etc.
#20
Posted 06 December 2012 - 10:49 PM
paperboy, on 06 December 2012 - 05:18 PM, said:
A lot of these states still schedule some privates in regular season play. As far as the rest...I suppose that's one opinion, but somebody could always schedule the New England Patriots too if they want that notion. I'm not claiming anything against the said schools you named, but in general, it's just a matter of equality on the playing field. It's not sympathy for publics, more so than publics playing by public system rules and agendas and privates playing by private school rules and agendas.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users