238 replies to this topic

[Kennedy]

CaTTT, on 13 October 2012 - 08:20 AM, said:

Don't use my name in Spanish, whoever you are.

It's gato anyway. Unless you're calling him a girl!

[Rd2Glory]

Kennedy, on 13 October 2012 - 11:00 AM, said:

Ok, so assuming they beat the 2 MAC teams that didn't make the playoffs that's still only 4-4 against any combination of St. Henry, Versailles, Coldwater, DSJ, ML, St. Henry, Anna, and Minster.

So if they were to play a MAC schedule they would have to win both non-con. games, parkway, ft. recovery, new bremen ( assuming they play all three) and only lose to three of the above teams? It wouldn't happen.

Of that 4-4 record, all 4 losses were teams who would either later win the state championship or would finish runner up (2006 St. Henry, and 2008-2010 DSJ), so I think it's safe to assume that those teams would be at least a top 3 team in the MAC in the given year.

My point is that, if they can go .500 against playoff bound MAC teams (as they've shown they can), then it's absurd to say that they may only get to 7-3 once in a decade if they're lucky.

[Kennedy]

Rd2Glory, on 13 October 2012 - 11:48 AM, said:

My point is that, if they can go .500 against playoff bound MAC teams (as they've shown they can), then it's absurd to say that they may only get to 7-3 once in a decade if they're lucky.

Once a year over the course of ten years. That's outstanding, but can they handle it week in and week out for an entire season? No.

They scored 7 in the first half at Bluffton. If you only score 7 in the first half at Coldwater,ML, St. Henry, DSJ ect. ( and lightning doesn't postpone the game) I promise you you'll be down alot more than 3.

Edited by Kennedy, 13 October 2012 - 12:09 PM.

[Rd2Glory]

Kennedy, on 13 October 2012 - 12:05 PM, said:

Once a year over the course of ten years. That's outstanding, but can they handle it week in and week out for an entire season? No.

They scored 7 in the first half at Bluffton. If you only score 7 in the first half at Coldwater,ML, St. Henry, DSJ ect. ( and lightning doesn't postpone the game) I promise you you'll be down alot more than 3.

Of those 6 wins, off the top of my head, I think they scored 10 points or less in the first half in at least 4 of them.

[Kennedy]

Rd2Glory, on 13 October 2012 - 12:36 PM, said:

Of those 6 wins, off the top of my head, I think they scored 10 points or less in the first half in at least 4 of them.

Once a year.

[CaTTT]

Kennedy, on 13 October 2012 - 11:04 AM, said:

It's gato anyway. Unless you're calling him a girl!

****** off, Kennedy. You're ruining a educational discussion post within the rocketcorner community, troll.

[Rd2Glory]

Kennedy, on 13 October 2012 - 12:52 PM, said:

Once a year.

I'm not really sure what you're even talking about with this "once a year" thing you keep saying.

[Kennedy]

Rd2Glory, on 13 October 2012 - 06:30 PM, said:

I'm not really sure what you're even talking about with this "once a year" thing you keep saying.

LCC plays a MAC school once a year. Going .500 over a course of ten years proves nothing.

Edited by Kennedy, 13 October 2012 - 06:48 PM.

[Kennedy]

CaTTT, on 13 October 2012 - 01:25 PM, said:

****** off, Kennedy. You're ruining a educational discussion post within the rocketcorner community, troll.

Clearly my public education is too much for you to handle.

[clutch]

Kennedy, on 13 October 2012 - 06:44 PM, said:

LCC plays a MAC school once a year.

And yet we defeat that team and that is your argument? If this arguement was made two years ago, you might make a point. Right now you look like a bitter delphos fan.

[Kennedy]

clutch, on 13 October 2012 - 06:50 PM, said:

And yet we defeat that team and that is your argument? If this arguement was made two years ago, you might make a point. Right now you look like a bitter delphos fan.

You just reiterated my last ten posts. You're trying to make it sound like LCC owns DSJ and the rest of the MAC. You pulled one out this
year,congrats. But beating a MAC school (.500) every other year doesn't prove anything. Go .500 against 8 straight MAC teams and i'll be impressed.

Edited by Kennedy, 13 October 2012 - 07:01 PM.

[Rd2Glory]

Kennedy, on 13 October 2012 - 06:44 PM, said:

LCC plays a MAC school once a year. Going .500 over a course of ten years proves nothing.

Kennedy, on 13 October 2012 - 06:46 PM, said:

Clearly my public education is too much for you to handle.

Kennedy, on 13 October 2012 - 06:59 PM, said:

You just reiterated my last ten posts. You're trying to make it sound like LCC owns DSJ and the rest of the MAC. You pulled one out this
year,congrats. But beating a MAC school (.500) every other year doesn't prove anything. Go .500 against 8 straight MAC teams and i'll be impressed.

I think your public education might be what's holding you back here. Those 10 games were over the last 7 years, but that is completely irrelevant to the point.

Of those 10 games, 8 of them (in which LCC is 4-4) have been against the upper echelon in the MAC in that year (the two that weren't were wins against 2005 St. Henry and 2007 DSJ - both of which would turn around to win state titles the following year). So it's not just "beating a MAC school every other year," it's "beating a MAC school that finished in the top 2-4 of the league every other year," or, to spin it my way, "only losing to a top MAC team every other year."

If LCC is .500 against the top of the MAC, it's safe to assume they'd beat the middle and bottom of the MAC in any given year. No one is saying LCC owns DSJ or the MAC. All any LCC fan has said is that they'd do better than "7-3 once a decade in a fluke year when the MAC was down and they had an easy out of conference schedule." And, for the record, CATTT is not an LCC fan, or, if he is, is only making posts to get people riled up, which appears to be working.

Edited by Rd2Glory, 13 October 2012 - 07:18 PM.

[Kennedy]

Rd2Glory, on 13 October 2012 - 07:17 PM, said:

I think your public education might be what's holding you back here. Those 10 games were over the last 7 years, but that is completely irrelevant to the point.

Of those 10 games, 8 of them (in which LCC is 4-4) have been against the upper echelon in the MAC in that year (the two that weren't were wins against 2005 St. Henry and 2007 DSJ - both of which would turn around to win state titles the following year). So it's not just "beating a MAC school every other year," it's "beating a MAC school that finished in the top 2-4 of the league every other year," or, to spin it my way, "only losing to a top MAC team every other year."

If LCC is .500 against the top of the MAC, it's safe to assume they'd beat the middle and bottom of the MAC in any given year. No one is saying LCC owns DSJ or the MAC. All any LCC fan has said is that they'd do better than "7-3 once a decade in a fluke year when the MAC was down and they had an easy out of conference schedule." And, for the record, CATTT is not an LCC fan, or, if he is, is only making posts to get people riled up, which appears to be working.

Lol
Some peoples kids.

So to sum it up LCC is .500 against the MAC?

Edited by Kennedy, 13 October 2012 - 07:35 PM.

[clutch]

Kennedy, on 13 October 2012 - 07:33 PM, said:

Lol
Some peoples kids.

So to sum it up LCC is .500 against the MAC?

Public education.

Look back through your posts....realize you're dumb. Bye

[jeffcat-bucki]

clutch, on 13 October 2012 - 07:52 PM, said:

Public education.

Look back through your posts....realize you're dumb. Bye

I don't disagree, although I had to laugh considering 5 of the LCC grads I lived with down at OSU in my college years....all failed out of OSU.

[clutch]

jeffcat-bucki, on 13 October 2012 - 08:54 PM, said:

I don't disagree, although I had to laugh considering 5 of the LCC grads I lived with down at OSU in my college years....all failed out of OSU.

That's the result of effort, not pure stupidity. Lol not that its not embarrassing.

Edited by clutch, 13 October 2012 - 09:05 PM.

[jeffcat-bucki]

clutch, on 13 October 2012 - 09:04 PM, said:

That's the result of effort, not pure stupidity. Lol not that its not embarrassing.

Hmmm I don't know about that one. A few of their expulsionary methods were stupider than something I could even begin to fathom.

I'll just leave it at that though.

[Kennedy]

clutch, on 13 October 2012 - 07:52 PM, said:

Public education.

Look back through your posts....realize you're dumb. Bye

Since '03

MAC - 11(and they're mostly all catholic for free!!)
LCC - 0

i'll see you in Massillon...... wait, no I won't.

Edited by Kennedy, 13 October 2012 - 10:52 PM.

[flounder]

jeffcat-bucki, on 13 October 2012 - 09:54 PM, said:

Hmmm I don't know about that one. A few of their expulsionary methods were stupider than something I could even begin to fathom.

I'll just leave it at that though.

'stupider'.......is there such a word.....just curious!!!!!!!

[jeffcat-bucki]

flounder, on 13 October 2012 - 11:12 PM, said:

'stupider'.......is there such a word.....just curious!!!!!!!

Fine...more stupid if you want to be a grammar nazi.