gumby is always right! (IMO, at least, the majority of the time.....lol)
Lets talk a little Browns Football!!!!
#141
Posted 20 August 2009 - 01:45 AM
gumby is always right! (IMO, at least, the majority of the time.....lol)
Bandido- November 24, 1957- August 12th, 2011.....RIP, my good friend... things will never be the same here without you. :(
Gonemad -June 26th, 1962-May 13th, 2008
sliceslicebaby@facebook.com
sliceslicebaby@twitter.com
#142
Posted 21 August 2009 - 01:26 PM
At least to me it is looking like Brian Robiskie is going to have a hard time getting a lot of playing time. I see the depth at WR looking like this:
1. Edwards
2.Mohamed Massaquoi
3.Furrey
Then we add in Cribbs who looked very good against the packers.
#143 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 23 August 2009 - 08:35 AM
PS......Pay Josh Cribbs whatever he wants!
#144
Posted 25 August 2009 - 03:04 PM
Please....now.....
#145 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 26 August 2009 - 12:58 PM
#146
Posted 26 August 2009 - 03:21 PM
+1
(That means I agree)
#147
Posted 26 August 2009 - 03:32 PM
(That means I agree)
I agree, as well......
(Do I need to explain the hilarity I found in one Browns fans explaining something to another Browns fan???!!!???!!!)

Bandido- November 24, 1957- August 12th, 2011.....RIP, my good friend... things will never be the same here without you. :(
Gonemad -June 26th, 1962-May 13th, 2008
sliceslicebaby@facebook.com
sliceslicebaby@twitter.com
#148
Posted 27 August 2009 - 06:06 AM

Yeah, yeah, yeah...glad I could entertain you. (Ok-I laughed too)
the +1, -1 rating thing is used on some other sites...didn't know if people here knew what it meant.
Edited by fortfan, 27 August 2009 - 06:10 AM.
#149
Posted 27 August 2009 - 06:14 AM
the +1, -1 rating thing is used on some other sites...didn't know if people here knew what it meant.
lol
uhmmmm, yeah.......I got at least one, -1, there (huddle)......
You gave to admit, that was pretty funny!! LOL.....(or do you need me to explain it to you?)
Edited by slice slice baby, 27 August 2009 - 04:23 PM.
Bandido- November 24, 1957- August 12th, 2011.....RIP, my good friend... things will never be the same here without you. :(
Gonemad -June 26th, 1962-May 13th, 2008
sliceslicebaby@facebook.com
sliceslicebaby@twitter.com
#150 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 27 August 2009 - 07:54 AM
#151
Posted 29 August 2009 - 08:44 PM
Not bad......
I am watching and the 4th quarter just started. Browns up 20-14 and driving for another score. I really have to think that Quinn distanced himself tonight in the QB derby...but then, I'm not a coach. Anderson looked good on a few plays-but too many bad things happen when he is in the game. (Sack, penalties, balls thrown out of bounds...). the TD to Edwards that Quinn threw was pretty!
Score is now 23-14.
They don't look like the worst team in the NFL tonight.....................
Go Browns!
#152 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 29 August 2009 - 11:00 PM
Secondly, I think we might have the best special teams in the division. At least if they continue to play like they didd tonite. If nothing else, the new coaching staff seems to have us playing with much more passion than the past.
Thirdly, Jamal Lewis should be looking over his shoulder as there is a rookie pushing him and maybe surpassing him. Think about this....James Davis, sixth round RB out of Clemson, could he be like another sixth round pick named Davis from a few years back.....Terrell Davis? I know crazy talk but he sure looks good.
I think all aspects of the team are better than last year. Right now I am fired up and Quinn must be named the starter tommorrow. Even Braylon looked like he is the player we drafted him to be at least tonite.
Browns fans can be excited at least for another couple of weeks!
#153 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 30 August 2009 - 07:50 AM
#154
Posted 30 August 2009 - 09:15 AM
Gummy...if my opinion is worth anything...you my man...are not the idiot here....(never did like Trent as a player either)
#155
Posted 31 August 2009 - 08:36 AM
#156 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 03 September 2009 - 01:51 PM
After watching the game last night, I was a little disappointed that neither Quinn nor Anderson played. They continue to say they are keeping it quiet to keep the Vikings guessing. Does anyone really believe the Vikings Defense cares who is at QB for the Browns? Really, they stop the run first and worry about the QB later. We would be doing them a favor by starting the statue known as Derek Anderson and they already know that so who are we fooling? Stupid!
The Browns again made some stupid unnecessary penalties last nite but continue to play with an enthusiasm and passion not seen for several years. James Davis continues to look like a better running back than Jamal Lewis. Again I like everything this team is doing right now except for this QB business.
As the season opener draws nearer, as usual I am excited about our fresh start, watching Brady Quinn for a full season and unlike these national publications who have no clue when they print such non sense, I am looking at around 6-10, 7-9 or god forbid 8-8? ok 6-10!
Edited by Gumshoe, 04 September 2009 - 08:53 AM.
#157 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 04 September 2009 - 12:24 PM
Please, Eric Mangini, for the sake of your locker room, your career, and your city, name a starting quarterback. I don't know what your logic is in waiting this long. You didn't even play Derek Anderson or Brady Quinn in the final preseason game, so clearly the "competition" is over.
I understand that you wanted to make it an open competition and give the keys to the guy who performed the best in your new system under offensive coordinator Brian Daboll. I get that. But have you thought about the messages you are sending to everyone involved with the organization, especially the players.
The first thing abundantly clear at this point is you don't really like either of them. You may say it is a good situation and that you have two solid choices, but if you really liked one of them and thought he was your guy for your tenure in Cleveland, you would have already named him the starter. Instead, you have given the appearance that you are picking the lesser of two evils. Now that will get the rest of the guys to rally around that signal caller. Sheesh.
When you wait this long to choose between two veterans, every player on the roster recognizes that the guy who starts Week 1 will not necessarily still be the guy in Week 4, or earlier for that matter. We know the quarterback might worry about being jerked every time he makes a bad throw, which is bad enough. But at this point you have insured that wide receivers and offensive linemen will be looking at the sidelines if your starter struggles. That's not good.
Most people assume you are holding off on naming Quinn the starter, which he should be, because you want to trade Anderson. Do you really think acting like Anderson may be the starter is increasing his trade value? Really? I highly doubt that.
Or maybe you really think keeping it quiet will give you a competitive advantage for the opener against the Vikings. That's pretty silly for a couple of reasons. One, I think it will leak out which QB is getting most of the reps in practice. Second, Minnesota is going to have to prepare for both guys anyway because, who knows, you may pull the starter at halftime if he isn't playing up to your standards.
Quinn deserves the job because it is time to find out what he can do. It is really that simple. We know Anderson is talented but inconsistent. There was no clear separation in the preseason, so let's see what the local guy can do. The excitement around the city and in the community could even help give the club a boost.
I understand you like to play mind games and see how players react. I don't blame you for that necessarily. But some guys don't play well in those uncertain circumstances, and quarterback is not the position to be increasing the uncertainty on a daily basis. If you don't believe me, ask Rod Hood, whom you cut earlier this week.
"I never really knew where I stood there on a day-to-day basis, and I had never experienced that before in Philly and Arizona," said Hood, who landed with the Bears. "I would be first string one day and play well and then the next day I would be second string with no rhyme or reason."
That is the way things are in Cleveland so far under Mangini's watch.
Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writ...l#ixzz0Q9zeH6J6
I PRAY MANGINI ISN'T THE POLAR OPPOSITE OF ROMEO CRENNEL BUT I FEAR HE IS. WILL CLEVELAND BROWNS FOOTBALL EVER GET IT RIGHT IN MY LIFETIME. STATISICALLY I HAVE ABOUT 30 MORE YEARS.
Edited by Gumshoe, 04 September 2009 - 12:25 PM.
#158
Posted 04 September 2009 - 02:00 PM
Some rumors…..Jamal Lewis to be released. The backup QB (you have to assume it is Anderson) is being shopped around.
With 2 teams recently firing offensive coordinators-isn't it nice to see other teams with thse types of problems???
#159
Posted 04 September 2009 - 02:53 PM
Bandido- November 24, 1957- August 12th, 2011.....RIP, my good friend... things will never be the same here without you. :(
Gonemad -June 26th, 1962-May 13th, 2008
sliceslicebaby@facebook.com
sliceslicebaby@twitter.com
#160 Guest_Gumshoe_*
Posted 05 September 2009 - 05:40 PM
The biggest name on the list is receiver David Patten, a veteran of the trio of New England Super Bowl wins earlier this decade.
Also gone are fullback Charles Ali, defensive back Brandon Anderson, quarterback Richard Bartel, defensive back, Tra Battle, linebacker Beau Bell, offensive lineman Branndon Braxton, linebacker Titus Brown, offensive lineman Dustin Fry, defensive lineman Adam Hoppel, receiver Paul Hubbard, running back Chris Jennings, receiver Lance Leggett, offensive lineman Pat Murray, receiver Jordan Norwood, offensive lineman Kurt Quarterman, defensive lineman Brian Schaefering, offensive lineman Isaac Sowells, defensive lineman Santonio Thomas, defensive back Hamza Abdullah, running back Noah Herron, defensive back Corey Ivy, and tight end Aaron Walker.
Finally, the Browns announced that an injury settlement has been reached with defensive lineman Melila Purcell, who already had been on the team's injured reserve list.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users











