
2008 NW Ohio Div. 3 Top 10
#101
Posted 27 August 2008 - 09:32 PM
1. Ottawa Hills
2. Kalida
3. Bluffton
4. Temple Christian
5. Ottoville
6. Riverdale
7. Cory Rawson
8. Miller City
9. Ada
10. New Knoxville
#102
Posted 28 August 2008 - 02:03 PM
So you telling me because they are older, they are going to be that much better?
Wow I'm not sure but I'm pretty sure they already got beat by a very young temple team 3-1 and their goal came from a free-kick at the 6
:

Edited by Tstud9, 28 August 2008 - 02:13 PM.
#103
Posted 28 August 2008 - 08:52 PM
1. Ottawa Hills
2. Kalida
3. Bluffton
4. Temple Christian
5. Ottoville
6. Riverdale
7. Cory Rawson
8. Miller City
9. Ada
10. New Knoxville
#104
Posted 28 August 2008 - 08:56 PM
#105
Posted 01 September 2008 - 01:55 PM
#106
Posted 01 September 2008 - 01:58 PM
2. Kalida
3. Bluffton
4. Riverdale
5. Miller City
6. Temple Christian
7. Ottoville
8. Ada
9. Cory Rawson
10. New Knoxville/LCC
#107
Posted 01 September 2008 - 02:13 PM
1. Northview (3-0-0)
2. Athony Wayne (3-0-1)
3. Findlay (3-0-0)
4. Perrysburg (0-2-1)
5. St. Francis de Sales (1-2-1)
Division 2 Boys
1. Lima Shawnee (4-0-1)
2. Ottawa Glandorf (3-0-0)
3. Napoleon (3-0-1)
Division 3 Boys
1. Kalida (3-1-0)
2. Ottawa Hills (1-2-1)
3. Bluffton (2-1-1)
4. Riverdale (3-0-0)
5. Lima Temple Christian (3-0-0)
These rankings are from ossca.org. These rankings are as of Aug. 26. Rankings come out every Tuesday with the first state rankings coming out tomorrow. Should be intresting to see if they have Kalida or Ottawa Hills.
#108
Posted 01 September 2008 - 03:22 PM
Wow I'm not sure but I'm pretty sure they already got beat by a very young temple team 3-1 and their goal came from a free-kick at the 6
:

Are you referring to last year? Because this year Miller City is 4-0-0 so far. That TC game was in the 2007 season, not this year.
So Far MC Has played Bath, New Knoxville, Pettisville, and Continental.
They have a Game tommorrow as well against a very tough Bryan team from what I hear from Ottawa-Glandorf.
They do have 9 returning seniors but yes it's true, just because of age doesn't necessisarily equal skill. But they will be a team to beat this year in the PCL and for other teams on their schedule.
#109
Posted 01 September 2008 - 04:36 PM
This is goin to be a close game
#110
Posted 02 September 2008 - 08:33 AM
#111
Posted 02 September 2008 - 06:51 PM
Granted they just won today, but from the time you posted they were 3-1. They haven't tied this year at all lol.
#112
Posted 04 September 2008 - 09:04 PM
#113
Posted 05 September 2008 - 09:22 AM

#114
Posted 05 September 2008 - 12:01 PM
#115
Posted 05 September 2008 - 12:38 PM

Bluffton's Schedule:
http://www.blufftonpirates.com/index.php?c...les&sport=3
We will see what Bluffton is made of once they complete the tail end of the schedule.
#116
Posted 05 September 2008 - 02:59 PM
#117
Posted 06 September 2008 - 09:22 AM
#118
Posted 06 September 2008 - 03:15 PM
Deuce, couple of reasons....Temple went through a few lean years when they just were not real competitive. Add to that no JV team and then throw in a side of terrible field.
There are a few teams that dropped them for that reason.
#119
Posted 06 September 2008 - 05:19 PM
Bluftton's football team has 35pts this year. Granted they have had three games, but the soccer team has 41 goals so far.
Owned.
#120
Posted 06 September 2008 - 06:29 PM
There are a few teams that dropped them for that reason.
True they did go through some rough years....field condition isn't a good reason, bluffton plays several teams who have fields that aren't up to par, and I also heard the Temple is playing some JV games this year....I was just curious I guess cause I noticed VB, Cory, Bath, LCC on their schedule.
Are there any other games that aren't going to happen this year that would be good games?
Games that should be interesting in the future...
Kalida v Bluffton
Temple v Botkins
Ottoville v Kalida
Temple v Ottoville
Kalida @ Miller City
Also a district Semi-Final Rematch between LB and Temple in 2 wks
Edited by Deuce22, 06 September 2008 - 06:30 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users